Bharat that is Indu: The original names of our country
by Jayasree Saranathan on 14 Sep 2023 8 Comments

Nowadays no one asks what is in a name or why not any name, while naming one’s child. Lot of thinking goes into finding a name for the child. Concepts such as energy and vibration of the name and what the name conveys are given due consideration. The Sanatan system of thought also followed certain concepts to pick out a name for the new-born in a ceremony called ‘Nama-karma’ – naming the child soon after birth. Our land too must have been given a name with suitable meaning when it came into being.

 

Specific names referring to our land are invoked in the Sankalpa mantras uttered for every act of religious and Vedic work. After mentioning Time in terms of Yuga, we say ‘Jambu Dweepe, Bharata Varshe, Bharata Kande’ and continue with the locality of residence by referring to a nearby river’s name. This mantra with timeless beginnings indicates that we live in Bharata Kanda which is part of Bharata Varsha, located in Jambu Dweepa. Who gave this name and when are questions that have definite answers in Vishnu Purana.

 

In Chapter 2-1 of Vishnu Purana, there is a description of how this earth was initially divided among people. A king by name Priyavrata, born to Swayambhuva Manu, divided the earth into seven dweepa-s. A dweepa has several meanings of which the meanings ‘continent’ or ‘shelter’ make better sense as locations suitable for living. He assigned each of them to each of his seven sons by which the dweepa named Jambu Dweepa came under the control of Agnidhra. Agnidhra means the one who takes care of the Agni in a homa. It is the name given to the priest who kindles the Homa fire.

 

Agnidhra divided Jambu dweepa into nine divisions and gave them each to each of his nine sons. The land south of Himavat came under the control of his son named Nabhi. He called it Hima, meaning cold or ice. He was succeeded by Rishabha and then by Rishabha’s son Bharata. The country from thenceforth came to be called after him as ‘Bharata Varsha’ where varsha stands for ‘division’ – of Jambu dweepa.

 

Varsha also means rainfall and it is possible to assume that this Varsha division took place after the starting of monsoon rainfall in our country 13,000 to 12,500 years ago – the date given by Overpeck et al. (https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211619)

 

After many generations, during the period of Vishwagjyothish, the country was divided into nine divisions, known as nine Kanda-s. A Kanda refers to a further division or stem of the Varsha of Bharat. Thus, nine Bharata Kanda-s came into being. As per Tamil dictionary, the Nava Kanda-s included eastern Videha, western Videha, northern Videha, southern Videha, northern Revata, southern Revata, northern Bharata, southern Bharata and Madhya Kanda. In course of time, 56 countries such as Anga, Vanga, Kalinga, Chera, Chola, Pandya and others started springing up within the nine Kanda-s of Bharata Varsha.

 

Etymology of Bharata

 

Over thousands of years, new countries have come up within Bharata Varsha with many of them annexing others or in regular fights with neighbours, but they all stood by an underlying unitary culture of Bharata, which is best explained by the etymology of the term given in Vishnu Purana and a concept noted in Vayu and Brahmanda Purana.

 

In Chapter 4-19 of the Vishnu Purana, the meaning of Bharata is given in the context of Bharata, son of Dushyanta and Shakuntala. The child was born in the hermitage of sages, who decided to unite the couple and entrust the child to its father, Dushyanta. Dushyanta could not recognise Shakuntala and therefore was advised by the sages to accept her and the child as a father who must cherish the child. Bharas is the root, word meaning ‘cherished’. Therefore, the child came to be known as Bharata.

 

Apart from ‘cherishing’, Bharas also means ‘holding’ and ‘bearing’. The country is being cherished and held and therefore it is ‘Bharata’. In the lineage of Dushyanta’s son Bharata was born Hasti, who founded Hastinapura. The lineage after him who ruled from Hastinapura came to be known as ‘Bharata-s’. The Mahabharata is the story of Bharata-s. By coming in the lineage of Sibi, the cousin of Dushyanta, the Chola-s also can be called as Bharata-s. In fact, all the people of this country are Bharatam Janam – an expression given in Rig Veda III.53.12 “Visvamitrasya rakshati brahmedam Bharatam janam” (Vishvamitra’s mantra protects the people of Bharata). 

 

Bharata also refers to the agni used in yajnas. There are basically three types of Agni-s – Pavamana, Pavaka and Suchi. Pavamana is created by rubbing Arni sticks. Suchi is the solar fire. Pavaka is the agni drawn from lightening strikes. This agni is known as Bharata! According to the Satapatha Brahmana, this Bharatagni supplies Havya to Devas (I.4.2.2). Bharatagni being fundamental to Vedic culture, it holds the country that cherishes Agni.

 

The initial name as Bharata Varsha coming from Bharata, the grandson of Agnidhra, it appears that he named the country after Bharatagni that was essential even in ordinary life in those days after the end of Ice Age. It was difficult to grow Agni and maintain Agni. The Aupasana homa was ordained for everyone to grow and protect the Agni throughout one’s life. The rationale seems to lie with the difficulty in making Agni.

 

The Agni so protected will protect one in mundane as well religious life. Perhaps it was Bharata, the grandson of Agnidhra, who made it mandatory for everyone to cherish Agni so that the Agni cherishes them. By this the entire country came to be cherished by the Bharatagni. So, the name Bharatam arises from the fact that this country was a Yajna Bhumi right from its inception. This name continuing to be in use in Sankalpa Mantra goes to prove that it was meant to keep this country Vedic in culture.

 

The Tamil culture which zealots claim to be exclusive, also has stuck with the name Bharata, as it appears in the 2000-year-old twin epic of Silappadhikaram, namely Manimekalai. In several verses in old Tamil, the country is also recognised as Jambu dweepa. Manimekalai goes a step further by stating that the Guardian deity – a female Goddess – of the Jambu dweepa was in Pumpukar.

 

Long before the river Kaviri was born, a woman who did penance under a Jambu tree was elevated into a Goddess with a boon to protect Jambu dweepa. The place where she did the penance came to be called “Jambu-pati” which in Tamil was known as ‘Samba-pati’. It was here river Kaviri entered the sea during the period of Agastya of Ramayana fame. Since then, the place came to be called as ‘Kaviri Pumpattinam’ which in course of time became ‘Pumpukar’. Such unitariness of Jambu dweepa from Pumpukar to Himalayas was recognised by identifying Bharata Varsha as the land between the Himalayas and Indu Sarovar – the olden name for the Indian Ocean.

 

Bharat that is Indu

 

Indu Sarovar as the name of the Indian Ocean raises our curiosity to know if Indu was an indigenous name related to our country. In his book ‘Glimpses of World History’, Jawaharlal Nehru says that,

“India was known of old as the Land of the Moon-Indu-land! Hiuen Tsang also tells us about this and describes how suitable the name is. Apparently even in Chinese In-Tu is the name for the moon.”

 

“In his travelogue, he (Hiuen Tsang) records that “the correct pronunciation for Tien Chu (India) is Intu” which means the moon in Chinese language. He further elaborates that “the scholars from that land have brightened the world with their delightful and shining knowledge, like the moon.”

 

Even the name Hindukush is not correct, according to Nehru. It was Indukush: “This mountain range was famous for medicinal plants that bloomed in the moonlight. The Sanskrit word “Indukush” (Hindukush) means “krupan” (leaves or grass) that grows in the moonlight.”

 

Ibn Batutta gave a wrong meaning as ‘Hindu-killer’ which was faithfully copied by western writers and Indian secularists. Note that Jawaharlal Nehru did not manipulate nor alter the original meaning of India.

 

Indu seems to be the indigenous name for our country and that is why it was found as ‘Indica’ in the work by Megasthenes, the 4th century BCE Greek historian. Indu is the land of Devi, the Goddess of the Moon. We can relate it to the first-ever name, Hima, given to this country by Nabhi.

Hema or Parvati was the daughter of Himavan. She was referred to as Bharati in the Rig Veda, having two sisters namely, Saraswati and Ila (Rig Veda: 1. 142, 1.188, 2.3 & 9.5). Justifying the worship of Indu as the manifestation of Goddess Shakti, evidence of Shakti-worship by means of a triangular stone was found in ‘Baghor Shrine” in Sidhi district of Madhya Pradesh. Archaeologist Jonathan Kenoyer dated the shrine to 9,000 BCE (11,000 years old); a similar structure continues to be worshiped by the people in the vicinity. Kenoyer observed, “The fact that it is worshipped even today, shows the remarkable continuity of religious beliefs in India.”

 

Triangle is the shape of the Shakti Yantra worshiped by devotees even today. Interestingly, Bharat also is triangular making it special for drawing the power of Mother Goddess. The ocean to the south of Himalayas was duly known as Indu Sarovar. Today it is known as Indian Ocean. The land between Himavat and Indu Sarovar came to be known as Hindustan.

 

In an article titled, “Who is a Hindu,” published in January 1965, in a monthly called “The Call Divine,” edited by Kaviyogi Maharishi Shuddhananda Bharatiar from Bombay, Brihaspati Agama is quoted as saying that the divine land extending from the Himalayas to the Indu Sarovar (Kanyakumari) is known as ‘Hindustan’.

 

People have been thinking that ‘Hindu’ is the name given to us by Persians and other foreigners. This seems unlikely according to the version of Brihaspati Agama cited above. The name Hindu is also found in Madhava Digvijayam of the 14th century, where it says that a ‘Hindu’ is one who regards AUM as his mantra, who believes in rebirth, who is devoted to the cow, who is harmless and who is devoted to ‘Bharat’. This quote also appears in The Call Divine.

 

An oft quoted verse from Brihannaradiya Purana states that the word Hindu is drawn from ‘Hi’ from Himalayas and ‘Indu’ in Bindu Sarovar (Indian Ocean) to denote the people living in Hindustan spread between the Himalayas and Indu Sarovar. This is like the word ‘Hora’ in astrology, which people claimed to belong to the Greek, but clarified by Varahamihira in Brihad Jataka as a shortened form of ‘Ahoratra’. 

 

What is Indu, indigenously expressed to identify our country, was pronounced as Indae and India by outsiders. That identity, being compatible with our own given name Indu, we have easily accepted. If it was a completely new or alien name, we would not have accepted it. So, India is very much part of our identity as Indu, while Bharat is our name given by Nama-karma at the birth of our country. This land holds us (Bharas) by which we are cherished in the wisdom of the Yajnas. 

User Comments Post a Comment
Just brilliant. Thank you
Rakesh Ahuja
September 14, 2023
Report Abuse
A brilliant exposition by the author on the term Bharat/ India/ indica.
I would like to bring to the attention of the author as well as the general public about quack historians.

In the Times of India dt 6 sept 2023 ,Devdutt patnaik who is described as a mythologist wrote "" The name Bharat was only carved 200 years after megasthenes wrote his Indica in 100BCE. "" . So this means that word Bharat came into existence after the birth of Christianity in 100CE?????

This mythologist is notorious for distorting Hindu history and puranas. This quack should explain how the word Bharat was attached to the famous Epic Mahabharata which is believed to be approximately 3200 BC or5200 years from present.
Furthermore the word bharata occurs in the Ramayana which is much older than Mahabharata. Bharata is one of the blood brothers of Rama. .

In the Bhagavad Gita chapter 1 verse 24 Sanjaya addresses dritharashtra as decendant of Bharata clan. In chapter 3 verse 41 Prince Arjuna is referred to as bharata
Again in chapter 4 verse 7 which the most famous one bhagwan Sri Krishna addressed Arjuna as bharata.
Yada yada hi dharmasya glanir bhavati bharata. .
Thus in the Gita we find both dritharashtra and Arjuna being addressed as bharatas -- obviously in the sense that all citizens of India were bharatiyas.
Panikkath Krishnan unni
September 14, 2023
Report Abuse
Wonderfully detailed ! Thankyou.

The mention of the Tamil dictionary mentioning the Nava Kundas is also significant and thus rejects the DMK attempts to divide Tamil Nadu from the rest of India.
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
September 15, 2023
Report Abuse
India and bharath are completely different entity.

India is continuation of British east India company beurocracy, in every aspect. Whereas bharath is completely different political and social setup.

To say that India and bharath are one same is outright lie and a false propaganda.

Let's go back to 1947.

British India was composed of madras presidency, Bombay presidency, Bengal presidency. The total land area directly ruled by them was just 45% of current land mass. And even then, the British Indian govt in its setup was always alien and oppressive.

The rest of the land area was ruled by 565 independent princely states which had their native administration system.

The right wing people are creating a myth that bharath was one single country since ancient days and hence they try to project that current colonial Indian state was continuation of that bharath. Again its outright lie .

Bharath was never a single country at any point of time. It was composed of 56 independent dhesams and this fact has been well documented in our ithihasas and so many stone and copper plate inscriptions.

Senthil
September 29, 2023
Report Abuse
The author tries to defend two alien identities namely the India as a country, and Hindu religion with weak arguments quoting a anglicised british protege like Nehru.

She deliberately avoids discussing about the real historical facts which are found in the Archeological Survey of India, in the form of stone and copper plate inscriptions. The ssi records published by ASI should be the basis for debating what the people of this country identified themselves.

But she deliberately avoids discussing about these in most of her articles.

The entire history of India is reduced to just religious narrative, completely suppressing and eclipsing the various rulers of this land, and the diverse ethnic groups. This pattern is not just seen in her articles, but in many of the right wing hindutva writings.

This i call as right wing distortion of the Indian history, which is far more dangerous than the left wing distortion.


senthil
September 29, 2023
Report Abuse
There are many components defining a nation.

1. The administrative structure governing the people and the ruling class which established that.
2. The ethnic groups that inhabit the land.
3. The economic structure.
4. The religious composition.
5. The geography, climate, fauna and flora native to it.
6. The rights of various people group over the land.

Bharatha varsham is referred as NOT a single country, but as a group of countries with a geographical and climatic conditions based on the monsoon pattern. It is NOT based on any single ethnic groups. Thats why the description of bharatha varsha extends up to southern chinese province of Yunnan, which is the actual cheena dhesam that our historical refers to.

The boundaries of these dhesams are well demarcated based on the natural boundaries, river basins and catchment areas.

So what the author references to Jambu Dweepam, Bharatha Varsham, Bharatha Kandam, are actually geographical classification, and should not be seen with Hindu religious connotation. Just because these narrations are mentioned in our sankalpa mantras, it does not become religious.

Next coming to ethnic groups, the chinese (Yunnan) are completely different ethnic/racial group from the main land Bharath as defined by physical traits. People in the north eastern regions have more affinity to the chinese than the rest of india. When we come to bengal, we can find a slight deviation.

Coming to Gangetic plains, there are different ethnic/ racial groups with distinct features. The people of south india are ethnically separate from the north indian.

The people in western regions, (punjabis, rajasthanis, marwaris, gujaratis) are all exhibit different physical traits from the eastern regions.

(... to be contd)
senthil
September 29, 2023
Report Abuse
At a social level, the people group of bharath can be classified in to three major categories.

1. Varna people. (eg: Rajputs)
2. The Tribal groups (Jats, Gujjars, Meenas etc)
3. The aborigines. (gonds, chenchu tribes etc).

The varnashrama rules applies only to Varna people group. It is not applicable to the Tribal and aborigines.

Among the varna people, the rajputs are the widely known kshatriyas today. There are many sub groups within rajputs.

It is these kshatriyas, who established the dhesams across india right from ancient days. As the first son of the king takes over the ruling authority, other sons, establish dhesams in other areas by clearing forests, and settling people and create a functional society. If not, they would get a share of land within the dhesam. The establishment of Indraprastha by pandavas by clearing the forests is a good example to relate to.

The kings / the clan of kshatriya who clears forest and establish dhesam have the inherent right to rule over that land. He in turn gives rights to the people group who chose to settle in his dhesam. And this right cannot be even taken away by the king, unless the people group rebels against him. In tamilnadu, there were many brahmadeyams, chaturvedi mangalams donated by the cholas and pandyas for the brahmins, to practice and excel in the vedas.

There are many SSI records which detail about these rights being contested and judgement given by laterday kings.


It is by this process, that 6 lakh gramams (villages) of bharath came in to existence. Each village was built by the ethnic group who inhabitated it.

The gramams were the fundamental units of any dhesam that existed in the pre-colonial Bharath. These gramams were not destroyed even by the invaders. In tamilnadu, the telugu people who ruled for over a century, created new villages to settle here. They did not destroy existing villages.

But after 1947, the Colonial Indian state nullified all these rights over the lands inherited for millenia by different ethnic groups across india. For eg, there were numerous chaturvedi mandalams enjoyed by brahmins, which was given to them by the native rulers. This right was not recognized in the Colonial Indian state, and Brahmins were thrown out as social and political orphans, with their generational villages pillaged and destroyed.

Like wise, the rights of each community was destroyed by indian state. The rights of tribals over their forest is another example.

With these background, on what basis does the author of this article claims India and Bharath to be one and same? can any one answer ?
senthil
September 29, 2023
Report Abuse
The varna people are mostly patrilineal and are well organised in to gothrams. The rajputs have kul and gotra as the basis of their organisation. Every lineage (vamsa) of rajputs were well documented and there is a separate community dedicated for maintaining those records. Similarly the brahmins, and vyshyas have their own set of gotras.

The Avarna people groups (tribals, aborigines) do not have such a sophisticated organisation. The tribals exist as one single large community, headed by a chief. Due to their centralised nature, they were the source of fighting force for the kshatriyas. For eg, the bhil tribe was one of the fighting forces of the rajputs.

There has been a cordial relations between tribals, aborigines and the varna society in the pre-colonial bharath.

The right wing has suppressed this fact, and distroted the varnashrama system in to a totalatarian ideology. A stereotyped narrative was created, where varna is generalised and all people who do not fall under brahmin, kshatriya and vyshya varna are classified in to Shudras. It is based on this stereotype, the Indian state has created a categories for scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe, and then made a atrocity literature out of it. The ruling class has been converted in to a oppressors, and the tribal people in to oppressed victims.

Worst is the creation of a fake religion called Hinduism, with a distorted Varna system as its foundational basis.

The dravidian movement in tamilnadu is able to capture power by capitalising on this distorted varna system of fake Hinduism.

The Indian state has been unleashing a systematic persecution of the historical ruling class of bharath, with these atrocity literature.

But the author wants to prove that both India and bharath are one and same.
senthil
September 29, 2023
Report Abuse