While observers are puzzled by the recent events in Egypt, and whether there was a military coup or not, or why the Britain’s ally, the Saudi Royal Family, suddenly shifted their position to help overthrow the Muslim Brotherhood government of Mohammed Morsi, the only significant issue to keep in mind is that the British Empire’s intention to destroy Egypt is still on the agenda. The British do not care who is in power.

What is important for the Empire is the policy of looting and destroying Egypt, which in the past 40 years, has been characterized by economic destruction through the IMF policies, which are backed by the recent US administrations, and by Europe. That Qatar and Saudi Arabia are suddenly on opposite front lines in Egypt (while still united in the destruction of Syria through their support for the British-deployed al-Qaeda jihadists) means nothing in the eyes of history, since both the Saudis and Qataris are puppets of the same British Empire. Anti-Islamist liberals of Egypt, who were mostly educated in British economic schools, are equally as dangerous to Egypt as a nation, as are the jihadists and Salafists.

For the empire, it does not matter if the cat is black or white. What matters is that it adds dead mice to its account. That is why the January 2011 “revolution” in Egypt never managed to bring about the changes in the tragic social-economic conditions of the nation, which were wrought upon the Egyptian people by the combination of the IMF, the European Union, and US policies imposed through the Hosni Mubarak regime. [1]

Then, following the organization of new Presidential elections in June 2012, and when then-President-elect Mohammed Morsi issued his Presidential declaration and his “First 100-day program,” it became clear that Egypt would not be relieved from these terrible conditions, and would enter into a new maelstrom of economic, social, and political crises leading to new upheavals and eventually to military intervention! This was made as a forecast by this author in July 2012. [2]

To make the point clear, here is the last paragraph of that article, which was published exactly one year before Morsi’s removal: “Morsi’s First 100 Days program, which he announced after the elections, is nothing but a low-calorie diet for the Egyptian people. He effectively proposes to maintain the status quo of poverty, by focusing on keeping the bakeries open with subsidies (a policy which adds nothing new, as it was even followed by former President Mubarak) as the first point in the program, and keeping the streets clean and traffic rolling as second, and making sure the old subway system is running (and so forth). Such a program shows that this President is not serious about alleviating the poverty and social injustice in the country. If Morsi does not break with the IMF and World Bank policies, and immediately call for an emergency mobilization to issue national credit to launch such crucial projects as Africa Pass, this President will only prove the points raised by this author about the origin and purpose of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

While providing bread to the people is necessary, this is not the only purpose of government. Instead of launching a massive reconstruction program and breaking all ties with the IMF and its policies, Morsi’s government emphatically spent the next six months begging (“negotiating with”) the IMF to return to Egypt, and to extend a humiliating $4 billion loan. Adding insult to injury, the IMF refused.

Not only did Mr. Morsi completely misread the internal situation in his country, and in the US Administration he was hoping would support him, but he also failed to realize how bankrupt the IMF, and behind it the EU and the USA, are, economically and financially.

The misguided Morsi government and the economists who supported it tried to explain that the sum of the IMF loan was not the issue, but that the IMF loan would have become a “certificate” of good behavior for Egypt, allowing it to indulge in borrowing money from international financial institutions. This would have further enslaved Egypt with more debt.

The problem of the Morsi government, in addition to its hunger for power, and as a political pawn for Anglo-American geopolitics - in its role as part of the international Muslim Brotherhood organization - was not lack of money but its lack of vision and knowledge of true economics, physical economy.

Mistakes Could Be Repeated

Now, what is to be feared, is that the new interim government of Egypt, appointed by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces on July 4, will resort to the same temporary measures and solutions to keep the status quo, leaving even greater burdens to the coming government, which is supposed to be elected three to four months from now, if political stability is preserved in the country!

The new interim President, Adli Mansour, issued a new constitutional declaration on July 8, which said almost nothing about the state of the economy. He left it to interim Prime Minister Hazem El-Beblawi to tackle this issue. Article 26 of the constitutional declaration states that the prime minister “issues the necessary regulation for the construction of public utilities and interests after the approval of the ministerial cabinet, but if these imply adding more burden to the government’s general budget, they have to acquire the approval of the President.”

Now, for any government, whether in Africa or even Europe, to stay within the limits of its budget, leaves no space for any investments in public utilities, or any meaningful large-scale projects to put the masses of unemployed people to productive work and increase the productivity of the economy as a whole. This becomes even impossible in light of the fact that the Egyptian government deficit has been increasing at a rapid rate, especially since April 2011.

The Egyptian Finance Ministry announced in March this year that the total budget deficit reached 10.6% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) in the first ten months of the 2012-13 fiscal year. The deficit reached US$26.5 billion, compared with $16.8 billion in the period from July to April of the 2011-12 fiscal year. This deficit was expected to reach 11.5% of GDP by June. In 2012, budget revenues were at US$50 billion, and expenditures were $77 billion.

Egypt has been borrowing in the international financial markets to finance its budget deficit, and has been receiving preferential loans and aid from Qatar, the main supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the region. Qatar has extended US$8 billion so far to the MB government.

Following the overthrow of Morsi, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait pledged US$8 billion in loans and grants to the new government. But everything has a price, and these generous offers will tie Egypt to the process of forever chasing handouts to fill the deficit.

Qatar, on the other hand, was looking for booty in Egypt to loot in return for its loans, as was the case with its attempt to lease the Suez Canal Corporation, an operation which was stopped after massive popular protests. Another attempt by Qatar’s “sovereign wealth fund” QInvest was to take over a 60% stake (worth US$250 million) in the largest Egyptian investment bank, EFG Hermes.

The deal, which was rejected by Egyptian financial regulators in May 2013, was brokered by none other than JPMorgan Chase, which advised EFG Hermes and Goldman Sachs, which were advising Qinvest. EFG Hermes is typical of the corrupt financial institutions that are completely integrated with the Anglo-American speculative financial empire, and which were participating in the IMF-directed privatization of Egypt’s state-owned enterprises and assets in the era of President Mubarak. The deal was deemed by Egyptians to be politically infected, as two of EFG’s chief executives, Hassan Heikal and Yasser El Mallawany, are on trial, along with the two sons of the ousted Mubarak, upon charges of illegal share dealings in 2007 transactions.

More than a dozen domestic and international investment banks are active in Egypt, draining a significant amount of Egypt’s private capital into the global financial bubble.

Declaration of Independence

Although the current President and government are interim, emergency institutions, they nevertheless have the possibility and responsibility vested in them through the massive public manifestations in the recent uprising, to declare the intention of the government and the nation of Egypt in terms of its future economic policy.

First, the fallacy of the current belief in money as the most urgently needed element for Egypt’s economic recovery has to be dealt with. A related problem is the belief in “foreign investors” as a magic cure for most problems. It is therefore urgent for Egyptian government officials and economists to study the historic background provided by LaRouche PAC on Alexander Hamilton’s methods to get a deeply indebted United States, which had just exited a Revolutionary War against the British Empire, to stand on its feet, by creating a truly sovereign credit system, whose purpose was to increase the productivity of society as a whole, through focusing the nation’s own credit and financial resources on necessary “internal improvements” of infrastructure development, science, and technology. [3]

A more recent example are the policies of the government of Argentina under both the late President Nestor Kirchner and his wife, the current President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.

What the Egyptian nation needs is to regain its sovereignty and independence, in economic terms. This can be made possible through these preliminary steps:

• That the President declare publicly the intention of the Egyptian government to rebuild the nation’s economy through a number of concrete and well-known projects, and direct all available resources and energies toward that goal. The government should seek the consent of the Egyptian people to achieve that goal, as if Egypt were embarking on a new war effort. The government should also declare that the nation finds itself in a state of economic emergency condition.

• Under such a declaration of intent, backed by the people, and being in a state of economic emergency, the Egyptian government will then allow itself to take certain drastic decisions:

1] Reversing the IMF policies: a) Severing all formal ties with the IMF and the World Bank “temporarily,” and canceling policies imposed on Egypt by these institutions in previous years, such as structural adjustment, privatization of public enterprises, and liberalization of trade.

b) Freezing the free-trade agreements with the EU, especially the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements, whose intention is to create a free-trade area in accordance with the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO) through “the gradual removal of customs duties; the prohibition of quantitative restrictions on exports and imports.” Freezing these agreements, which made Egypt and other North African nations victim to unfair competition with Europe, will allow Egypt to impose tariffs and restrictions to protect its fragile agricultural sector, and to ensure a certain degree of food security, by dedicating the arable land and supporting the Egyptian farmers to produce the food that the nation requires. The emphasis on exporting of foodstuffs to acquire foreign currency, which was encouraged by the IMF policies, should be reduced. As an alternative to the Euro-Mediterranean agreements, Egypt would renegotiate bilateral trade and cooperation agreements with the European nations individually.

c) Imposing currency exchange restrictions to protect the value of the Egyptian currency and prevent capital flight.

2. Defining the urgently needed development projects: In declaring that intention, the government of Egypt should clearly identify the weaknesses of the economy of the nation, and propose concrete remedies. For example, Egypt has been suffering from chronic shortages of food, fuels, electric power, housing, public transport, and unemployment, to name a few.

While hundreds, and maybe thousands, of urban infrastructure-modernization projects have been awaiting implementation for as long as decades, in every city and town, it is through the mobilization of a national, top-down reconstruction effort that the nation’s resources could be mobilized. The key three sectors of infrastructure without which neither agriculture, nor industry could develop are: energy, water, and transportation.

Energy: In the energy sector, Egypt’s long-neglected nuclear energy program, which was planned to be launched in the early 1980s, has to be revived. While Egypt’s nuclear ambitions go as far back as the 1950s and President Eisenhower’s “Atoms for Peace” policies, it was in 1984 that the Egyptian Supreme Council for Energy decided to begin construction of three nuclear plants, starting with the Al-Dhabaa plant on Egypt’s northeastern Mediterranean coast. The plan was to produce both energy and desalinate seawater.

But the intention to abandon nuclear power and technology in the West found a good excuse in the Chernobyl nuclear incident to block all discussions of new nuclear plants, especially, for developing nations. Egypt has had a problem finding partners in the West to build the reactors. In the current situation, only Russia, China, and probably South Korea, would be willing to discuss these issues with the Egyptian government, and these possibilities should immediately be explored. Re-launching of the nuclear program should be made a key element of the new government’s declaration of intention.

Egypt’s petroleum sector is ill-managed, and requires new investments. The refinery capacity is so low that Egypt exports $9 billion worth of raw petroleum annually, but spends exactly as much on imports of refined petroleum products from industrialized nations. Egypt is in dire need of modernizing this sector and building refinery capacity to meet the massive shortages in automobile fuel and other petroleum products. Egypt should find ways of cooperating with the leading refinery and chemical plant builders in the US, Germany, and Japan to launch joint ventures to build such capacity in Egypt.

Water: While Egypt has enjoyed the comfortable company of the Nile and its narrow valley for thousands of years, the time has come that the Egyptian people move into new areas of the country, out of necessity and for their advantage. The nearly 80 million Egyptians live on only 6-7% of the land area of their country. Creating new, urban, agro-industrial centers to the west of the Nile Valley has become an absolute necessity. That area is a fertile, mineral-rich region, but is not connected in any way to the national transport, water, and energy grid. Egyptian engineers and scientists have urged successive governments to implement scientifically viable and economically feasible projects for this purpose, to no avail.

The three top projects this author is familiar with, which are aimed at achieving the reclamation of the desert, are: a),The Development Corridor proposed by space scientist and Egyptian-American patriot Dr. Farouk El-Baz. [4] The corridor of roads, rail, and canals is to run parallel to the Nile valley all the way from Aswan in the south to Alexandria in the north. The details of the project have been described in previous reports in EIR and can be studied on Dr. El-Baz’s own website (http://faroukelbaz.com/).

b), The High Nile Pipe River project, proposed by Dr. Hamdy Saif El-Nasr, geologist and aqueduct engineer. This project is based on channeling water from the highest point of the Aswan Dam in southern Egypt, through large-diameter pipelines, along the mountain range that flanks the Nile Valley from east and west. A secondary pipeline system will bring the water down to the desert areas by the force of gravity, generating electric power. The project is supported by a large number of engineers. (The campaign website for the project is https://www. facebook.com/The.High.Nile.River.Pipes).

c) Africa Pass: This project, proposed by Egyptian engineer Aiman Rsheed, has the advantage of being a regional and transcontinental infrastructure project connecting Egypt to Central and East Africa, and the Mediterranean, through a high-speed railway system, and also bringing water to the Western Desert of Egypt from the African Great Lakes region and eastern Congo through a canal (see footnote 3).

3. Creating a national credit system: To avoid the trap of monetarist thinking, which implies that without money at hand, nothing is possible to build or achieve, it should be made clear what a Hamiltonian credit system means, and how that system was the keystone upon which the US was built as a modern, powerful economy. The Hamiltonian system implies that the nation and its government reassert their national sovereignty through an independent credit system, and that the purpose of the government and the economic system is to develop the land and the people, and that a financial system is established to reflect that intention.

Therefore, the declaration of the intention is primary. Determining what steps to take to realize that intention in real physical-economic terms is step two. And finally comes the question of financing. But all three steps must be clarified in the Declaration of the government.

While it is true that the government of Egypt is suffering a large budget deficit, and that Egypt is one of the most indebted nations in the region (about 1.2 trillion Egyptian pounds or about US$500 billion in domestic debt, and US$33 billion in foreign debt in 2013), the Egyptian nation is not bankrupt.

By declaring its intention to unchain itself from the current economic conditions, Egypt will be able to domestically and externally make itself creditworthy. It is important to remember that the true capital of Egypt is its people, the millions of well-educated youth, its natural resources, its strategic location, its history and national character. What has been missing is a vision of the future, which can be provided in an appropriate Declaration of Economic Independence.

Even in simple monetary terms, Egypt has internal capital in both dollar and national currency, deposited in various savings and investment accounts in the country that surpasses any IMF, Saudi, or Qatari loans by orders of magnitude. The problem is that that money is invested in investment banking activities, both in Egypt and on international markets, that add almost nothing to the net physical productivity of the Egyptian economy.

In the best case, that money is not invested at all. The Egyptian Finance Ministry announced in March 2013 that Egyptians have deposited US$33 billion in various bank and savings accounts. An even greater amount is suspected of having been converted to dollar or other foreign currency outside the banking system, for fear of political upheavals and chaos, which have depreciated the Egyptian currency dramatically in the past two years.

All financial assets in the nation have to be regulated to ensure that these assets are channeled toward investments in productive economic activities, rather than pure speculation, for example. They can also be encouraged to be part of the national credit mechanism to finance the reconstruction of the country.

If the Egyptian government decides to launch the reconstruction program, it would have to establish a National Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Private capital can subscribe to this institution, which will be backed and guaranteed by the state. However, the principal matter is that the government as a representative of the present and future interest of the people, use its power to create its own credit through the Treasury and the central bank, not merely to fill the gaps in its own current budget, but as allocations to the national reconstruction plans. A sovereign nation’s government has the right to become indebted in order to secure the future of the nation by increasing the productivity of labor and raising of living standards, and ensuring that the debt incurred this way will be redeemed in due time.

The credit generated through the Reconstruction and Development Bank will be channeled through government corporations and commercial banks to corporations that are involved in the specific projects.

As for the needed foreign capital goods, they will also be financed through bilateral mercantile long-term credit and trade agreements, or export guarantees by the exporter nations, which themselves are in need of markets and opportunities for investments.

The key to ensuring both domestic and foreign confidence is that the leaders of the nation of Egypt have a clear vision of the future and a steadfast determination to alleviate the living conditions of the people, and to make the country a major contributor to prosperity in the region and the world, in a concrete physical economic sense.

Notes:

1.See background reports by the author: “It Is Not Just an Egyptian Crisis,”: EIR , Feb.18, 2011; “The Myth of Overpopulation in Egypt,” EIR , Feb. 18, 2011.

2. See “Pan-Islamism Is the Death of the Nation!” EIR , July 13, 2012.

3. See “What Europe Can Learn from Argentina,” EIR Special Report: Emergency Program for an ‘Economic Miracle’ in Southern Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and Africa, June, 2012.

4. See “Farouk El-Baz, Ph.D.: Geologist Proposes 1,000 Wells for Darfur; Use Science To Serve Mankind,” EIR, Sept.14, 2007.

Hussein Askary is an EIR analyst based in Europe