The Myths of Global Warming – 2
by Peter Eyre on 09 Dec 2009 0 Comment

We now move to the Victorian period when industry progressively moved forward and we saw extensive use of coal-fired steam engines for industry, commercial vehicles and coal used in every home. This period was truly the dark ages in the environmental sense. Towns and cities contained many factories with chimneys as far as the eye could see. Each location became engulfed under a blanket of thick black smoke.

 

Overtime, new technology came into being, but the coal era continued into WW2 and of course the “Cold War”. When certain conditions prevailed towns and cities would get absolutely choked up with “Smog,” a combination of smoke and other contaminants mixed with fog. Right through these early days in Victorian times and right through the Cold War, pollution took its toll. Respiratory problems especially in such places as the Midlands of England kept the doctors and hospitals busy. A particular area north of Birmingham and extending up to Stoke on Trent was referred to as the “Black Country.”

 

The region was described as ‘Black by day and red by night’ by Elihu Burritt, the American Consul to Birmingham in 1862. Other authors, from Charles Dickens to William Shenstone, refer to the intensity of manufacturing in the Black Country and its effect on the landscape and its people. I can distinctly remember walking home wearing a white business shirt and many times noticing the collar inundated with tiny black specs. One could imagine the impact this had on people’s lungs.

 

It was a clear-cut case of intense manufacturing and to hell with the environment. As we progressed into the 1940’s, manufacturing intensified for the war effort and new foundries and factories popped up everywhere. Between this time and the 1950’s the level of airborne pollution was becoming totally unacceptable, but the government continued to press for production, production and even more production, especially in the steel industry. It was also during the period between the 1940’s and 1950’s that coal gas started to come into being. So we had coal fires and gas cookers (the latter being toxic if breathed from leaks or when the flame had accidentally gone out). Many places started to show extremely high incidents of lung disease coupled with much colder winter and freezing fog/smog. We had the added contamination from WW2 and the Cold War when the skies were always full of squadrons of bombers and fighters. 

 

Despite the levels of pollution in those early days it was an acceptable norm for people to walk around literally choking to death. The airborne pollution frequently blocked out the sun, which increased the problem two-fold as the temperature was kept low due to lack of heat penetrating the earths surface. Houses always appeared both dark and cold, thus requiring more heat and lighting. During the 1960’s huge reserves of natural gas were discovered and a full conversion took place that took away this terrible period in our environmental history.

 

During the Cold War period I ended up in the icy waters of the north. The area covered was between Greenland, Iceland and the Northern Tip of Norway. We found the ice in general was very unpredictable with access in many places. During this time US Nuclear submarines came into being and surfaced up through the ice. I found that ice never formed on the structure of the ships despite the cold, which would indicate that changes in the climate existed even in the mid to late fifties. It is my opinion that the levels of pollution after WW2 and during the early period of the Cold War were extremely excessive to say the least. Engines were extremely thirsty with high exhaust levels.

 

We had coal in every industry, every school, and every home, with uncontrolled levels of pollution that made the atmosphere almost impossible to breathe. On the aviation scene we had squadrons of long-range bombers and fighters on constant patrols, some of which had eight engines or more, all very environmentally unfriendly. They undertook long-range patrols towards the USSR and constantly remained airborne around our respective coastlines.

 

It is so important to look at the contribution made to our environment by the military and the oil and gas industry. There are so many measures that could have been taken into account both past and present by our respective governments if they were truly sincere about our carbon footprint. Commercially speaking, the west is accelerating its economic growth in all sectors with no regard for the environment; and blaming third world countries for the state of our planet. The US alone is one of the biggest energy consumers in the world. Governments could carry out many actions without punishing third world countries.

 

Peter Eyre, a former British Naval officer, worked at NATO headquarters, and spent a lot of time in the Middle East and South East Asia as a petroleum consultant; he lives in the UK and writes regularly for the Palestine Telegraph 

User Comments Post a Comment
It is the writers dream to expect Indian people to put any pressure on the Indian government to reclaim and retrieve Gilgit and Baltistan. One has seen how an inept congress regime was brought back to power even after the Mumbai 26/11 tragedy. No one cares in India as the Indian masses are concerned only about Bollywood and Cricket.
Deepak Ganju
December 04, 2009
Report Abuse
Prof. Teng has rightly analyzed that the Indian leadership did not realize – and still does not realise - that Partition brought about the territorial division of India. Kudos for calling a spade a spade and pointing out that Indian National Congress had long before the British quit, abandoned commitment to the continuity of Indian history and the civilisational frontiers of the nation. But it still shocked to learn that Congress refused to integrate the States Peoples’ movements for the freedom of India because of Muslim League leaders. Vajpayee’s bogus peace process seems a continuity of Congress tradition – no wonder he felt he was a Second Nehru!
Madhur
December 04, 2009
Report Abuse
Gandhi and Congress took us for a ride. Very few of us know even now that at the Asian Solidarity Conference, New Delhi, 1946, Gandhi and Nehru showed complete disregard of the crucial importance the national borders in the emerging new nations. The Indian disrespect for borders begins with these two men. Manmohan’s rubbish about porous borders is a Congress tradition!
Prasad
December 04, 2009
Report Abuse
>>Jammu & Kashmir is the central spur of the northern frontier of India - critical to the security of Himalayas, security of whole north India and basic to any future balance of power in Asia. >> This says everything. The article is a must for everyone trying to understand indian security
utsavc@gmail.com
E-mail Address(es):
utsavc@gmail.com
Urmila
December 04, 2009
Report Abuse
A diligent, thoughtful article. Hope it reaches the eyes and ears of our defence planners.
Saran
December 04, 2009
Report Abuse
What Prof Teng has penned down is a reflection on the kind of leadership, which is at the helm of affairs. It may appear ludicrous but it is a fact that the custodians of the Indian State have, like the Indian Left, never considered India as a State in the real sense of the term. It would be no exaggeration tp say that they endorse the Left's perverted view that India is a congreggation of more than twenty nationalities and each one of them deserves the right to go out of India.The lack of interest of the so called custodians of the Indian State towards the otherwise higly strategic and vital northern frontier--- life line of India-- needs to be viewed in this context.The worst aspect of the whole situation is the complicity of the so called ultra nationalist BJP and its source of inspiration and mentor in the brek India crusade unleashed by Islamic radicals. The very fact that the BJP and its mentor are not opposing the so called peace process with the expansionist Pakistan should be taken as a proof that the Congress and the powers that be in the South and North Blocks and the so called nationalist organisations are working in tandem to dilutethe indan control over the frontiers.
Prof. Hari Om
December 04, 2009
Report Abuse
Absolutely moving. The article is a sad reminder of what exactly went wrong. The most tragic part is there's been virtually no effort by our successive rulers to amend their criminal complacency since the blunder of 1947. There was a probable chance to regain the lost territories of Jammu & Kashmir after the1971 war. But the then government did not try. All of us know how Gandhi-Neheru promoted nefarious anti-India & anti-Hindu elements in Kashmir and the dubious art 370. But the truth is - the problem now needs to be solved with resolute determination and patriotic zeal - a war if required. GOI's meek submission to whims of missionary managed America is a matter of serious concern for our sovereignty. We have to be strong and fight our own battle for the sake of our Matrubhumi. I think our people have turned materialistic and seemingly least bothered about Bharat. Otherwise, no government would have dared to court separatist. Dialogues are just facades to divert public opinions. Its being done to promote the interest of the west rather than us.
Kuna Mohanty
December 04, 2009
Report Abuse
More than how Kashmir is being taken away, we are witnessing a weird phenomenon in the name of 'peace process' of how the Indian State and the political establishment are devising novel methodologies of giving away Kashmir. Indian State appears to be suffering from AIDS where in its own immune system has turned against it. Indian State and its leadership wants to defend borders by making them porous. They want to strengthen Sovereignity by sharing it. It seems the Indian State is at war with its own civilisation.
Dr Ajay Chrungoo
December 04, 2009
Report Abuse
Prof. Teng has underscored the Gandhi-Nehru duo's monumental indifference to territory. gandhi's moha for Nehru and Nehru's moha with himself with Mountbatten playing them both cleverly while the rest of the so-called Hindu stalwarts inside and outside the INC simply sttod on the sidelines and watched the Muslims walking away with territory. More and more must we write about the critical importance of territory to being a nation.
Radha Rajan
December 04, 2009
Report Abuse
Prof.M.K.Teng has disclosed the flaw of the contours of the Indian policy that are hell bent to demolish the Northern Frontiers of India to make it vulnerable to such an extent that civilisational domain of the nation is eroded.as it serves the interest of the fifth columnists who are making every possible extent to make the geography of the nation a non entity.The history of India is already presented in a perverse manner to project the civilisational bedrock of India in a perverted form.Prof.Teng needs to be applauded to highlight the face that the nations who do not incorporate the true understanding of national geography are bound to give territorial concessions to the adversary.Geography and the sense of the national geography should be the cardinal principle of the national foreign policy with the assertion that the territorial integrity of the nation is non-negotiable.He has scored a golden point by drawing home the point the nation which dabbles in ideological concessions to the enemies from inside as well as outside are then bound to give the territorial concessions.And this is the root cause which created the so called Kashmir Issue.
Mahesh Kaul
December 05, 2009
Report Abuse
Saanp (snake) Kay Aage Been Bajane Ka Kya Faida
Ravi Raina (Soul-in-Exile)
September 23, 2011
Report Abuse
Comments are free. However, comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. Readers may report abuse at  editorvijayvaani@gmail.com
Post a Comment
Name
E-Mail
Comments