Inculturation: Fooling the Hindu Masses
by Nithin Sridhar on 15 Jun 2009 16 Comments

Early in 1982, Father Joseph Parekatil of the Catholic Church of Parasahi, Madhya Pradesh, destroyed the sacred murti of Goddess Visveshwari Siddheswari, enshrined on the nearby Nawain Tekdi hill, and erected a small wooden cross.Later, on 18 February 1983, a 31-foot high concrete cross was illegally erected on the hill. A month later, enraged villagers destroyed the cross.


On 20 February 1985, intent on regaining possession of the hill, Father Parekatil put on the orange robes of a Hindu sannyasin, built a hut on the hill, sat on a tiger skin and began performing worship in the Hindu style. As a result, thousands of simple Hindus came to the hill on Fridays, unaware of the deception going on before their eyes.


On 18 May, a complaint was registered, but to no avail. Again there was agitation in the area, and this time, on 1 October 1985, the villagers tore down the priest’s hut and tossed away the remaining pieces of the concrete cross. Father Parekatil gave up only when he was arrested a week later for breach of peace (1).


Father Parekatil’s tactic of adopting Hindu symbols to further his missionary goals is known as “inculturation” or “indigenization.” Swami Jayendra Saraswati, Sankaracharya of Kanchi Matham, made a valid point at the “Interfaith Dialogue” with Cardinal Jean-Louis Pierre Tauran, president of the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Inter-religious Dialogue, and others,   in Mumbai on 12 July 2009.


The statement released to the media elaborates: “The Church in India must stop forthwith the use of Hindu religious words, phrases and symbols like Veda, Agama, Rishi, Ashram, Om and other such in what is referred to as ‘inculturation’ tactics, but which are only intended to deceive the vulnerable sections of our people who are the intended targets for religious conversion.”


He further challenged the church: “In 1999, Pope Johan Paul II had stated that the mission of the Vatican was to plant the Cross in Asia in the third millennium to facilitate the Christianizing of the world, which alone would cause the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. The Pope must tell us the rationale for the First Coming of Jesus Christ when there was no Christianity or the Church to undertake the mission to Christianize the world.”


The points raised are timely. Christianity has always followed a policy of ‘inculturation.’ It adopted Pagan elements in christianized form to pave the way for transition from Paganism to Christianity. Pagan gods became Christian saints and Pagan festivals became Christian festivals. In this process of inculturation, the Christian Church suborned old forms to its new message, making sure that the Pagan foundation was submerged under Christian doctrine (2).


Indigenization is evangelization,” says Kaj Baag. “It is the planting of the gospel inside another culture, another philosophy, another religion” (3). In the case of India, ‘inculturation’ or ‘indigenisation’ means ‘the incorporation of Jesus in Indian spiritual tradition.’ Fr. Bede says, “In India we need a Christian Vedanta and a Christian Yoga that is a system of theology which makes use not only of the terms and concepts, but also of the whole structure of thought of Vedanta” (4).


Shantivanam Ashram on the banks of the sacred Kaveri River near Trichy in South India appears Hindu. It has a Hindu shrine, saffron-robed “swami” seated cross-legged on a straw mat, devotees practicing yogic meditations, even chanting Hindu scriptures. But these impressions gradually prove false. First, the eye detects that the courtyard shrine is for Saint Paul and that “puja” is actually, a daily Mass, complete with incense, lamps, flower offerings and prasadam. Finally, one meets the “swami,” Father Bede “Dayananda” Griffiths, a Christian “sannyasin.”


This is a Christian ashram, one of more than fifty in India, which are described as “experiments in cross-cultural communication,” or as “contemplative hermitages that revolve around both Christian and Hindu ideals.” Fr. J. Monchanin, one of the founding members of the ashram, defines his mission: “I have come to India for no other purpose than to awaken in a few souls the desire (the passion) to raise up a Christian India. It will take centuries, sacrificed lives and we shall perhaps die before seeing any realizations. A Christian India, completely Indian and completely Christian will be something so wonderful the sacrifice of our lives is not too much to ask” (5).


Sita Ram Goel, in his book “Catholic Ashrams,” lists 108 such Christian ashrams in India, 4 in Nepal and 8 in Sri Lanka. These ashrams include Asha Niketan, Bangalore, Karnataka; Bethany Ashram (1938), Channapatna, Karnataka; Christa Sevakee Ashram (1950), Karkala, Karnataka; Christian Institute for the study of Religion and Society, Bangalore, Karnataka; Yesu Karuna Prarthanalaya, Kote, Mysore District, Karnataka, and others (7).


Lausanne Movement (for world evangelization) published a paper titled “Christian witness to Hindus” (1980), listing some of the methods to be implemented to convert Hindus:

1] We should enunciate theology in Indian categories so that the Hindu can understand the gospel.

2] We must develop a truly Christian worldview consistent with the Indian context.

3] While presenting the gospel, we must be aware of the fact that the Hindu understands the doctrine of God, man, sin, and salvation in a way entirely different from the biblical doctrine.

4] Communicate the gospel through indigenous methods such as bhajans, drama, dialogue, discourse, Indian music, festival processions, etc. (6)


The present Catholic ashrams have inherited a history of intrigue and subterfuge. The Niyogi Commission report on Madhya Pradesh, 1956, noted: “Robert De Nobili (a Catholic Jesuit priest) appeared in Madura in 1607, clad in the saffron robes of a Sadhu with sandal paste on his forehead and the sacred thread on his body. He gave out that he was a Brahmin from Rome. He showed documentary evidence to prove that he belonged to a clan that had migrated from ancient India. He declared that he was bringing a message which had been taught in India by Indian ascetics of yore and that he was only restoring to Hindus one of their lost sacred books, namely the 5th Veda, called Yeshurveda (Jesus Veda). It passed for a genuine work until the Protestant Missionaries exposed the fraud about the year 1840. This Brahmin Sannyasi of the ‘Roman Gotra,’ Father De Nobili, worked for 40 years and died at the age of 89 in 1656. It is said that he had converted about a lakh of people, but they all melted away after his death” (8).


This is the situation the Hindu finds himself in today. Christian missionaries have adopted Hindu ways of life, Hindu religious symbols, architecture, worship forms, and even declare themselves as Swamis. A Catholic priest who calls himself “swami” instantly attains the status and authority of a holy man in Hindu society, which he can use to convert individuals.


By using Sanskrit terminology in his sermons, he implies a close relationship of Hindu theology to Catholic theology, a relationship which does not really exist. Such missionaries speak authoritatively on Hindu scriptures and argue that their [Christian] teachings are consonant with everything Hindu, but add a finishing touch, a “fullness” to the traditional faith.


Under such situation, no inter-faith interactions will bring any fruits unless the “church” mends its ways. As the Kanchi Perivaar rightly affirms: “After such inter-faith meetings, the points agreed have to be faithfully abided. Otherwise the will be no point in holding such meetings. Unless the Church reassures Hindus that it will not conduct itself in a manner that wounds Hindu sensibilities and follows up on those assurances, such inter-faith meetings, no matter how frequently they are held, will be futile and will not serve any meaningful cause.”


References

1] Hinduism Today, Indian Ocean Edition, December 1988.
2] Salvation: Hindu influence on Christianity by Dr. Koenraad Elst.
3] Kaj Baago, Pioneers of Indigenous Christianity, Madras, 1969, p. 85.
4] Bede Griffiths, op. cit., p. 24.
5] “Liberal” Christianity, Ram Swarup.
6] “Christian Witness to Hindus”, 1980, Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization.
7] Catholic Ashrams: Sanyassins or Swindlers, By Sita Ram Goel.
8] Niyogi Commission Report on Christian Missionary activities.

 


The author is a student of civil engineering, Mysore

User Comments Post a Comment
The article is a stunning expose of the politics of the UPA - to recognise Jammu & Kashmir as a separate sphere of Muslim interest in the Republic of India; include J&K in the territories of India and in the political organization of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Then de facto hand over the state to Pakistan after 10 years (somewhat like the UN divided East Timor from Indonesia); and finally open the frontiers of India to invasions from the north once again. Will the people of India wake up?
Diksha
October 16, 2009
Report Abuse
It is an eye opener. How can Prime Minister of India get such a stupid idea. Who is going to agree to it accept ofcourse may be Sonia Gandhi. I would request Mr. Teng to throw some light on Agra Summit during Vajpayee's tenure when it was claimed that agreement for settlement had almost reached. Similarly it is claimed that in 1971 war Indira Gandhi had almost got a deal with Bhutto but then that also was not to be.
Rajinder KAchroo
October 16, 2009
Report Abuse
This government and the last were probably the weakest and most disastrous governments ever in the history of modern India. They are capable of any form of settlement because their strategic vision is so poor: witness the 1-2-3 Agreement (please see Brahma Chellaney's comments) with the USA and nearly withdrawing from Siachen towards the end of their last tenure (Pranab Mukherjee intervened at the very last moment).
What effect will it have on the morale of the Indian armed forces?
All of this is happening because the Hindu majority here has not realized their blunder in voting for the Congress.
seadog4227
October 16, 2009
Report Abuse
Manmohan Singh seems to have a hidden agenda of bringing India to pre Warren Hastings days, that is a balkanised India, or rather sharing the spoils fifty fifty with Pakistan.
Srinivasan
October 16, 2009
Report Abuse
This article is so good, it deserves to be disseminated all over the country.
RVR
October 16, 2009
Report Abuse
Mohan this is a very well written piece. Keep on writing so that people in this nation know the truth.
sanjeev
October 17, 2009
Report Abuse
Dear Dr. Taing,

Its a brave indictment of our political system. The state in India continues to be anti-people and is at war with its own civilization. Despite that the revolts are only to break away from the Sanskrit civilizational context. The voice of sanity for defining the civilizational boundaries and protecting the territorial bounderies of India i.e. Bharat are dubbed communal in this ignorant and insensitive country. We need a Hindu Revolution.
Dattatrey Kaul
October 18, 2009
Report Abuse
The article is written in an interesting manner, which gives layman a real feel of the situations across the border. Queries:
1. What does non-territorial solution mean in the context of Jammu Kashmir problem? [2] Statement:"In essence, Dr. Manmohan Singh’s approach underlines the recognition of Jammu & Kashmir as a separate sphere of Muslim interest in the Republic of India. The proposed non-territorial settlement seems to essentially envisage the inclusion of Jammu & Kashmir in the territories of India, but at the same time exclude it from the secular political organization of India. The approach further envisages the exclusion the state of Jammu & Kashmir from the territories of Pakistan, while at the same time including it in the political organization of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan." [3] Does it mean that Jammu and Kashmir regions under the non-territorial solution will be declared independent. [4] If yes, then what kind of rule exists in J & K? I would like to know more about this. Can you please explain in a detailed way? With regards
Kiran
October 22, 2009
Report Abuse
Actually this non-territorial solution is a subterfuge to say India (read Sonia-Manmohan) is willing to give up Kashmir to Pakistan to suit American interests in the Afpak theatre. So a process of slow absorbtion into Pakistan is proposed through the use of this disgraceful language. We are fighting with our backs to the wall to somehow stall this pure sedition. Warm regards
Editor
Sandhya Jain
October 22, 2009
Report Abuse
Will the same thing happen in Assam and West Bengal? Can some one please comment?
Desi
October 22, 2009
Report Abuse
The second partition of our Matrubhumi is seemingly close. Lets fight. The country isnt safe in the hands UPA. The self-styled secularists have ruined our holy land. Shri Mohan Krishen Teng - Thank You very much for this great article.
Kuna Mohanty
October 22, 2009
Report Abuse