2022: Can Biden save America from Recession?
by Naagesh Padmanaban on 03 Jan 2022 1 Comment

As the year 2021 comes to an end, it would be worthwhile to take stock of the highlights of the year gone by. This is not an attempt to list every major event, focus will be limited to the US economy. It is obvious that the economy was ravaged by the pandemic for most of the year although there were signs of abatement in the later part. In a series of positive developments, the country witnessed businesses slowly starting to reopen, people finding jobs and life slowly returning to a semblance of pre-pandemic normalcy.

 

However, much of this has been short-lived, given new challenges and threats that could eventually bring hardships to millions, particularly the low-income segments of society. Among the many challenges three stand out. Inflation, defying all expectation of being short lived, has continued its upward spiral. Secondly the supply chain crisis is nowhere near resolution. Thirdly, the resurgence of COVID and its new variant, Omicron continue to the sap the morale of Americans at large, who desperately need a break. In essence, 2021, although infinitely better than 2020, had not ushered in the revival and cheer most expected.

 

The issues first.

 

Prices have remained high for an abnormally long period during 2021. Data published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is indeed revealing. In the last twelve months, food prices saw an uptick of 6.1%. On the other hand, energy prices rose by 33.3% during the same period. Per the BLS, gasoline prices rose 58.1% since last year, the largest increase since April 1980. For instance, in the state of California, a gallon of regular gas remained higher than $4.00 per gallon since June. This has wrought untold hardships and miserable living conditions for millions of Americans.

 

Secondly, the unending supply chain crisis continues to put extraordinary pressure on the US economy. Although there was some improvement in reducing congestions at major ports, many experts think the US is still not out of the woods. In fact some experts think [1] the supply chain crisis could continue well into 2023. The consumer will bear the brunt and pay higher prices for food and other consumables.

 

Thirdly, the resurgence of COVID and the new variant Omicron have opened a new front for an already embattled economy. How quickly the variant will spread or how deadly it will be is still under cautious review by the health experts. On the other hand, there has been an alarming surge in new Covid infections. As of 29th December 2021, the seven-day average of COVID-19 cases topped 280,000 [2], almost as high as was witnessed in January. Many businesses fear that a lockdown will wipe them out.

 

At a time when the US economy’s post-pandemic economic recovery was at best tardy, this baneful convergence - of rising inflation, supply chain challenges, resurgence of COVID-19 and Omicron variant - is a cause for concern. 

 

Many businesses, large and small most likely may not survive a lockdown this time around. Given the precariousness of the economy, many experts have been cautious about prognosticating the prospects of the economy in the upcoming year.

 

How has the response to these challenges been?

 

The response to rising inflation has been tepid. According to Mohamed El-Erian [3], Chief Economic Advisor, Allianz, “the characterization of inflation as transitory is probably the worst inflation call in the history of the Federal Reserve and it results in a high probability of a policy mistake”. Inflation, which stood at 6.8% as of November 2021, marked the biggest 12-month move since 1982. The Fed must step in quickly to tame inflation.

 

One thing is clear. The US economy is in no robust health now and must tread extremely carefully in the New Year. Albeit for reasons beyond its control, America is slowly and surely losing its position as the preeminent economy in the world. Much will depend on the Biden administration’s forthright leadership as well as its ability to inspire confidence in its own decisive responses in seeing the country through. This too may prove to be a challenge.

 

For starters, the President’s approval ratings have been sliding for some time now. CNN [4] reported that Biden now had the lowest net economic rating for any president at this point through their first term since Jimmy Carter in 1977.

 

In fact, the tanking of Biden’s image had its origins in Afghanistan. The bungled withdrawal was in fact a preview of sorts for what was in store. The visuals of desperate Afghans climbing and running alongside the US Air Force plane in Kabul as well as images of few Afghans falling from the sky not only shocked Americans but also numbed the world. Biden had quickly failed his first major test.

 

Biden certainly has botched the Afghanistan test. But he will have no room or time for any faux pas while rescuing the US economy. It can push the economy into a deep recession. If the President’s past performance is any indication of the future, America may have really challenging times ahead.

 

Despite all the negativity, the American economy is a behemoth that has survived multiple train wrecks, largely because of the innovation, ingenuity, and hard work of market participants in staving off catastrophe. But nevertheless, the dangers persist and are very real.

 

Notes

1] https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/us-port-delays-holidays-determine-if-supply-chain-crisis-extends-2023-says-expert

2] https://www.npr.org/2021/12/29/1068802576/us-record-new-covid-cases

3] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/13/el-erian-says-transitory-was-the-worst-inflation-call-in-the-history-of-the-fed.html

4] https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/21/politics/joe-biden-jimmy-carter-economic-ratings/index.html

User Comments Post a Comment
"The area also looked like a war zone, with hundreds of armed security personnel, armoured vehicles, water-cannon trucks, teargas equipment and riot-control vehicles ready to thwart any attempts to enter the state. Wire fencing augmented the blockade. "...........This sentence speaks volumes about the situation,nothing more to add.
observer
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
Omar Abdullah deserves dismissal for insulting grace of Parliament. The hauling of two leaders of opposition in
Parliament and then treating them as enemy agents by detaining for five hours at the landing pavement of Jammu Airport yesterday as most outrageous act of the Government of J&K and deserves immediate and urgent attention of Prime Minister of India to bring Chief Minister of J&K to justice. Mrs. Sushma Swaraj (Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha), Mr. Arun Jaitley (Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha) and Mr. Anant Kumar (M.P. from Karnataka) were made to stand
inside the Airport while arrival doors were shut by the police depriving the opposition leaders to use toilets even for five hours. We invite the attention of the Speaker of the Lok
Sabha and Chairman of the Rajya Sabha to take cognizance of this authoritarian act of J&K Chief Minister who acted as ‘Sultan’ of Kashmir to hurt the grace of the Parliament.
Bhim Singh
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
I am completely at a loss. When Narsimha Rao was Prime Minister, if I remember correctly, Indian Parliament pased a resolution that Pakistan occupied Kashmir was an integral part of India. What has govt of India done to enforce its resolution? Was it just an exercise in futility? Forget about Muzaffarabad for a moment, even in Srinagar the mighty Indian super power -- at least dreaming to be -- cannot unfurl the symbol of India -- why is it? Is even Srinagar part of India or not/ Why is it wrong to unfurl Indian flag? If it is not part of India then why waste national resources on it? Will there be same situation if Kashmir was not a Muslim majority state? Before 1947 Punjab, Sindh, Bengal, NWF had Muslim majority areas -- parts of these are no longer not part of India. What does it tell to a person with even an iota of common sense? Can someone please explain why is it a bad idea to unfurl Indian flag in its own territory? Can someone give me at one simple sensible reason.
Vinod
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
"Can someone give me at one simple sensible reason",Vinod yes i can!Does a "DISPUTED" teritory ring any bells for you?Does those United Nation's resolution agreed upon by the democratically elected Indian goverenments has any weight on you?Does those promises/speaches made by your elected Prime Minister in Lal chowk has any meaning to you?Does those Green flags hoisted by Kashmiris tells you any thing?Does those rules (agreed upon by Hindu and Muslim leaders of the time) by which the partion was to take place means any thing to you,just to jog your memory let me repeat them again ,all the Muslim majority areas would go to Pakistan and the other to India.If still you are not clear then you could be suffering from a retrograde amnesia,with best regards.
observer
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
The facts of the resolution is as follows. It was Atal Bihari Vajpayee, then Leader of the Opposition, had introduced a resolution in the Lok Sabha reiterating that the whole of Jammu & Kashmir is part of India. Narsimha Rao suggested to Atalji that instead of the latter, the resolution should be moved by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, at the time it was Shivraj Patil. The Lok Sabha then passed the resolution unanimously. In this context, it is also necessary another resolution which Atalji
wanted to introduce. It was during the early 1960s, when Jawaharlal Nehru was the prime minister. The resolution was to delete Article 370 from the constitution. Jawaharlalji said that it was not necessary, since many aspects of the article had already been deleted, and that it will eventually disappear (the words used were 'ghiste ghiste ghis jayega). It should be remembered that the title of the article is "Temporary provisions regarding Jammu & Kashmir". Clearly the framers
of the constitution wanted the article to be eventually eliminated.
It is a tragedy of Indian politics that very little was done by the BJP since. However, what it more forcefully exposes is the hypocrisy of the class of people (both politicians and non-politicians) that go under the rubric 'secular'.
Ashok
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
Thanks for giving the details. It is better not to make a law than to make a law and not enforce it. It weakens the power of the state. By passing a resolution in parliament and then not enforcing it sends a clear message to the world that the GOI itself does not believe in what it says. It now does not even have a fig leaf to cover itself.

India's problems are its own creation -- it is naive to blame others.

What credibility does the GOI can have abroad when its government itself declines to hoist its own national flag in its own boundaries. Is the mighty GOI afraid of a few hoodlums? What right such an administration have to run a country -- whether it is BJP or Congress. It is not a question of party -- it is a matter whether J&K is part of India or not and what does the administration think of it.
Vinod
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
I think such a statement is a blanket condemnation of the people at large, and, if so, is most unfair on the population. It should be understood that the ones creating the problems are those who think that they are guiding the destiny of the nation. And, here, the major culprits are those who are supposed to occupy the intellectual space in the society, and not so much the politicians. It is these 'intellectuals' who are expected to explain the issues to the people in a dispassionate manner. But they use their position to push forward their own personal agenda, and not the truth.
Ashok
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
One is horrified to learn that J&K police entered the Durganath mandir, Chinar Mandir and Hanuman Mandir in Srinagar to look for the hidden Hindus who may hoist the flag. Some nationalists who reached the venue later with flag were badly roughed up by the secular CM's men. Shame. Would he dare to have men in uniform enter churches and mosques to look for terrorists and would the great secular media have blocked out the news? Shame
Rajan
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
I am astonished to learn that Omar Abdullah has broken the established conventiont that the National flag at Jammu (winter capital of J&K) is hoisted by the Governor of the state whereas in Srinagar it is hoisted by the Chief Minister. Today however one learns with astonishment that Omar Abdullah deputed a minister to perform this ‘ritual’ at Srinagar Bakhshi Stadium at a cosmetic ceremony attended by 40 civilians mostly Govt employees. The NC Chief Minister has given a clear message to his patrons in Delhi and elsewhere that he means business and to the separatists thatNC stands by his commitment to champion the cause of the terrorists by challenging the states integration with the Union of India and daring to stop BJP’s entry to J&K
Addy
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
Pls read foll. links:
http://satyameva-jayate.org/2011/01/25/disturb-sleep/
http://www.sandeepweb.com/2011/01/25/lal-chowk-today-lal-qila-tomorrow/
and especially
http://vinodksharma.blogspot.com/2010/09/for-today-of-few-tomorrow-of-india.html

Jai Hind!
seadog4227
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
observer seems to be suffering from some selective amnesia. With 40% of J&K being non-sunni and desperately wanting to remain in India, you have no locus standi. Do you think India will send them into the fundamentalist maw of pakistan where they will be butchered or converted like the 10% of pakistani hindus who remained after partition? Don't quote rules and agreements when civilized nations all agree that genocide is a crime against humanity. Your wretched pakistan is guilty of it both within its boundaries and within the boundaries of bangladesh where it snuffed out the lives of 3 million people. you have no moral authority and are just making a laughingstock of yourself. Ethnic kashmiri hindus, sikhs, shias, christians and buddhists all wish to remain in India and want no part of your fundamentalist vision of kashmir--remember that.
Nagabhatta I
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
BJP did a great thing by taking up the flag hoisting issue at Lal Chowk. We understand what this event conveyed. A Muslim majority area will not allow the tri colour to be unfurled. Those who understand the significance of this will get the picture clearly. Slowly but surely more and more areas in India will not see the tri colour hoisted.
Shivram
January 27, 2011
Report Abuse