Organic farming and associated conundrum
by K P Prabhakaran Nair on 16 Aug 2018 16 Comments

Many Indians, if not all, have woken up to the virtue of organic foods, as compared to those derived from the highly soil extractive, chemically driven intensive agriculture, euphemistically known as the “green revolution”. There are even States within India which “officially” are “organic”, like Kerala, Odisha. The wealthy can afford “organic” foodstuff, be it vegetables, staples like rice, wheat or fruits, which are, on average, three-fold more expensive than the others grown in conventional ways.

 

But, the moot question is, are the products sold in the market today truly organic in nature? The general perception is that if an agricultural crop is grown without the use of chemical fertilisers and/or pesticides, it is organic. But, this not correct. The term “organic” goes much beyond this narrow definition. And, therein lays the rub.

 

Mahatma Gandhi University, Kerala, held hosted the second “Global Organic Meet” (April 21-25, 2018) where more than 2,500 delegates from all over the world met and deliberated the problems and prospects of organic farming, and marketing of organic products. In fact, there was a special TV crew from Berlin – Germany has gone organic in a big way – to cover the week-long event. The delegates were served organic food served on banana leaves, starting from breakfast to dinner. And everyone was obliged to eat with hands, no fork, knife and spoon, to the delight of this author and his wife, who were invited; I had the great privilege of delivering the keynote address.

 

There were Government of India representatives involved in the organic movement, like the Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), representatives from Indian agricultural universities, also from overseas agricultural universities which are involved exclusively in research and development in organic farming in a big way, and, needless to mention, scientists of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), including the president of the Indian Organic Association.

 

What is most important to examine is, how has the Government of India (GoI) come to the aid of the true organic farmer of this country, to spread the “organic message” across the length and breadth of the Indian subcontinent? Has it created more confusion than clarity? The following example illustrates a classic example of the organic conundrum.

 

As per the new regulation of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI, a seal on food packets), an organic farmer can obtain certification of his products through two routes, as a farmer wishing to sell his produce as “organic” must first possess this certification. The first route is to get a certification, valid for one year, from one of the 28 third party certification agencies accredited to APEDA (Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority), under the National Programme For Organic Production (NPOP).

 

This process can cost the farmer anything from Rs 15,000/- to Rs 30,000/- per annum, and an existing organic farmer has to wait for a whole year to get the certification, as per the Participatory Guarantee System for India (PGS) stipulations, which require that the farmer must join a group of at least five with similar farming type, and then apply for the PGS certification introduced in 2015 under Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana (PKVY, Traditional Faming Development Programme). The registration of a new member takes a minimum of three years. Also, a farmer has to peer review his fields thrice, each cropping season, during the sowing, harvest, field operations, and, once in between. It takes about a fortnight for this review to complete.

 

The NPOP requirement is as follows (source: Organic industry experts and farmers): Both farmers and processors can obtain a certificate from agencies accredited by NPOP, which is in operation since 2001. Those farmers who grow perennial crops like coconut, arecanut, Black pepper etc., need to wait three years to obtain a new certificate. Those growing annual crops like sugarcane, maize, rice, wheat etc., need to wait only two years. Those who already are organic can obtain the certificate under one year. The cost may vary from Rs 15,000/- to Rs 50,000/-, depending on the size of the farm and the fee of the third party inspecting team.

 

Though the certification process is a mark for genuine organic farmers, the moot question is: how many in India, who practice organic farming on a small to medium scale, can go through all this rigmarole before they can bring their produce to the consumer? For many of the large majority of small scale organic farmers, the regulations will slash their farm income by over 70 to 75 per cent. While PGS certification can be obtained for free, obtaining the certificate can take as long as three years, which is a very long wait for a small/medium scale organic farmer. It is important to note that prior to the enforcement of the new regulatory system, only farmers and food processors exporting their produce needed mandatory certification while domestic players could operate without it. 

 

What would be the impact of the new regulation on organic farmers?

 

Agriculture in India is practised in such differing conditions that no common yardstick can be applied throughout. For instance, in many of the north eastern Indian states, excluding Assam, ten million hectares are organic by default since the farmers have no access to either chemical fertilisers or pesticides. These farmers will no longer be able to sell their produce as organic. This will have a serious consequence on Indian economy because tens of thousands of these organic farmers will be pushed out of business.

 

The new regulation comes at a time when PKVY, initiated in 2015 to promote organic farming, is yet to take root. Among northern states, in Punjab and Haryana, the “granary of India”, only 131 and 488 farmers, respectively, are covered by the scheme. On the other hand, Uttar Pradesh has 38,781 farmers under the scheme. Of the 95,688 farmers who have been issued the certificates so far since its initiation, 18 per cent have now withdrawn from the certification procedure.

 

Simultaneously, “Not For Profit” organisations have taken the lead to issue certificates to more than 14,000 farmers in fourteen states under what is called “Participatory Guarantee Systems Organic Council” (PGSOC). But these farmers will have to again go through the expensive and time consuming procedures to obtain pucca certificates from NPOP or PGS.

 

What is the way out?

 

If the Government is committed to take India forward on the “organic route” because of all the very adverse fallout on food stuffs thanks to the chemically-driven “green revolution”, the mandarins in New Delhi will have to rise above bureaucratese and show more imagination than so far. At the same time, there is the threat of GM foodstuffs creeping into our foods. A thorough investigation by the New Delhi-based Centre For Science and Environment has clearly shown that GM products are found in 32 per cent of the 65 products tested, and while 80 per cent of these are imported, it is very worrisome that some Indian players are using these prohibited products, especially in the manufacture of infant foods. This will have a long range deleterious effect on the health of unsuspecting Indians. If India earnestly wishes to go forward the organic way, it should put in place a cost free, simple and time bound certification procedure to truly help organic farmers. Right now, that is missing.

 

The author was formerly Professor, The National Science Foundation, The Royal Society, Belgium and Senior Fellow, Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, The Federal Republic of Germany. He can be contacted at drkppnair@gmail.com

User Comments Post a Comment
That was a truly thought-provoking article. It has assisted me to understand the strategy behind the Australian Government's similar strategy to force up the price of organic foods and thereby advantage the traders of toxic foods.

Well done, Prabhakaram, and thanks.
Tony Ryan
August 16, 2018
Report Abuse
It is fair to criticise the current procedure, but your columnist - qualified to be the keynote speaker - should suggest an alternative. If he cannot, whom does he expect will - a bureaucrat?
Bharati
August 16, 2018
Report Abuse
I thank you, Mr Tony Ryan , and Ms Bharati, for your kind compliment and comment, respectively. As for the latter's comment, I have already done it, in the venue of the world meet, but, the whole thing has to pass through the red tape of GOI, which everyone knows will slow peddle key issues

In any case, I do not sit on an "ïmportant and big chair" in India to get things done swiftly. I hope and expect the message in the article would be carried to Shri Narendra Modi, our dynamic Prime Minister, and, he would issue relevant directives to the agriculture minister of GOI. Do you expect anything more to be done by me? I have already paid a big price, here in India, after the return of my wife (who is also a qualified scientist like me, Dr (Mrs) Pankajam Nair a nematologist trained in Europe) and me, for being truthful and vocal in key issues that adversely affect India's future in agriculture. The vested interests have hidden hands and deep pockets - I hope you get the point I am driving at.

Thank you both for reading this important article.
Professor K.P.Prabhakaran Nair
August 16, 2018
Report Abuse
Absolutely true
Ajay
August 16, 2018
Report Abuse
@ Prof Nair

"Do you expect anything more to be done by me? "

Just as you have lucidly explained to readers here the problem, perhaps you could likewise kindly enlighten us about a solution?
Bharati
August 16, 2018
Report Abuse
Respected madam,

I think, the first and foremost step, would be to come out strongly against this so-called "green revolution", which is nothing but a highly soil exploitative and chemically driven agriculture, put in place by vested interests. I have been trying to do that in my own ways, and, I have paid a big price for that. But, it does not deter me.

Madam, would you lead a crusade against the green revolution, from wherever you are?
Professor Prabhakaran Nair
August 16, 2018
Report Abuse
Dear Professor,

I have been a crusader, but in other domains (as the vijayvaani editor well knows!).

In terms of the environment / agribusiness and the like, I am not knowledgeable enough to be a crusading leader, but I can certainly be a crusading follower, and I actively disseminate information to laypersons in my (small) endeavour to increase awareness (and this vijayvaani editor herself has been at the receiving end of many of my mails!).

I mention the editor to show that I am seriously wanting you kindly to share a solution with us so that we can then spread it widely - including with sympathetic bureaucrats.

Dear Professor, all of us cannot be leaders - some make good followers - and where is a leader who doesn't need or have followers!

It is the responsibility of leaders, such as you, to educate followers, such as me, so we can create more followers for your work.

PS
And Bharati can well be the name of a man too - Agehananda Bharati, Subramania Bharati.........!
Bharati
August 16, 2018
Report Abuse
This mail is addressed to Bharati:

I would suggest the best thing to advise those, while buying vegetables, supposedly organic, is to ask for the certification. If the vendor can produce it one can buy without any hesitation. If you are buying from north-east Indian source, you can be almost certain it is organic. As for buying packed materials, there still is no way to identify whether the product is 100% organic. I have come to know that the GM bandwagon is into infant formula, where GM products are thrown in during manufacture. Almost 80% of these products are imported and there is no way knowing. Also unscrupulous Indian players are into it.

Our experience in this country is, after our return from Europe, dishonesty, to a large extent, is the prevalent mindset in commerce. I would n't say, it is universal, though. I guess it is a reflection of the inherent character of many Indians. Probably this is also the reason why the white man, while ruling India, treated every Indian as dishonest, until honesty is proved in a court of law (the habeas corpus principle, as against the American and French law where everyone is assumed to be "guilty" requiring one to carry the resident/citizen permit, unlike in India where you do not carry around your passport). Ironically, the white man stole all our wealth and built cities like London, OF COURSE, WITH INDIAN CONNIVANCE.The "Bengal famine" was simply a sham, where the British wanted to ship our food for war efforts, and here it was made as a case to push in the green revolution. The history of Indian agriculture is shameful, manipulated by the crooks. Here in India, the Indian business man cheats his own counterpart and goes round in a Merc, and we have a battery of unscrupulous lawyers to argue for him to exonerate him/her of the crimes. Look at our own politicians and their crony businessmen.

I request Bharati to stop this exchange of mail, as I am occupied with many other urgent and important global scientific matter, which I do not do for pecuniary benefit, but, for the betterment of, and, simply the passion for good science. Also, I have done enough, and still do, in my own small ways, for a clean India, in the speciality that I am in, paying a huge price for my uprighteousness and honesty. INDIAN SCIENCE IS VERY BADLY COMPROMISED. But, that does n't bother me, because, I believe, the righteous dies just once, the dishonest dies a thousand times, before the actual death.
I thank Bharati for the Kind attention in reading this mail
Professor K.P.Prabhakaran Nair
August 16, 2018
Report Abuse
I fully empathize with Sri.Prabhakaran Nair.

And totally agree with what he has written. Even when BJP came to power Prakash Jhavadekar as Agriculture Minister blindly welcomed Bt.Brinjal , genetically altered mustard , corn and so forth.

Practically every NRI naive & patriotic enough to ''serve'' India to ''do something good'' ends up thoroughly disgusted on seeing the all pervasive dishonesty .
J.Rajalakshmi
August 17, 2018
Report Abuse
This organic propoganda has to be distilled to access the ground reality.

1. First, any farmer willing to move to organic practices has to wait for atleast three years for his soil to recover and become sustainable. Provided he stops all chemical inputs, and recharges his soil with organic manure.

2. Even if the farmer stops chemical inputs (like fertilizer, pesticides), they could not do anything about the rampant hazardous pollution they received through water / irrigation sources. In Tamilnadu, the entire cauvery is polluted by sewages of big metros like Bangalore, salem, and particularly the Tiruppur Textile effluents. The farmer has no option in this scenario.

Along the entire noyyal belt, more than 1 lakh farmers has been heavily affected by the wastes of textile hubs Tiruppur and coimbatore.

In Velur district, the leather processing industry has virtually killed the palaar river.

I need not mention about chennai, chengalpattu and kancheepuram.

The govt never cares about these rampant pollution and is interested only in the FOREX these hubs generated. The same attitude shown by British East India company.

Even Hindutva intellectuals never address these problems. they never cared about the farmers or the rampant pollution.

3. In organic farming, the yield will reduce to certain extent for the first few years. The consumers are not ready to compensate with higher prices. Most consumers just ignore organic foods just because it is priced higher. But they are ready to buy a mobile or premier dress items at higher prices as dictated by those industry. They are ready to buy a liter of bottled water at 20 rs, but they want milk prices to be always low.

The govt has brutally suppressing the prices of agricultural products for its twin objectives - subsidise its urban factory workers and to move more and more farmers out of farming.

4. The rampant and brutal destruction of villages by urban centric indian govt, allowing industries and companies to go and grab vast swathes of lands whereever they want and setup polluting industries.

The first attack on villages is the panchayat act enacted by govt. This act, made traditional consensus based panchayats illegal, and forced an alien system of western conflict based democratic system. Thus collapsing the village administration.

The pre-colonial bharath has built more than 6 lakh villages. Whereas the colonial and post-1947 india has not built even one village.

When you destroy the very foundation of agriculture, how can the organic farming be possible?

senthil
August 17, 2018
Report Abuse
The urban consumers should not believe in organic certifications. Rather, they should try to directly engage the farmers, and procure products they want.
senthil
August 17, 2018
Report Abuse
@J Rajalakshmi

"Practically every NRI naive & patriotic enough to ''serve'' India to ''do something good'' ends up thoroughly disgusted on seeing the all pervasive dishonesty ."

Thank you. So all we RIs are pervasively dishonest.

NRIs left India to serve their own priorities. That is their prerogative. When they left, they were looking to their own "good", not India's. That too is their prerogative.

NRIs have the prerogative to leave us RIs to stew in our own disgusting all -pervasive dishonesty, instead of acting Teresa with us - and slandering us when we don't genuflect to them gratefully.

Prof Nair is doing sterling work - he is a great man, and has told us so in almost those words. It is to his great credit he has not given up, and nowhere in his column has he even hinted at dishonesty. He attacks, and rightly, bureaucratese. It is entirely possible that policymakers genuinely believe in agribusiness (as American policymakers do in the USA) - and it NRIs like Prof Nairare trying to educate them differently - instead of taking the easy way out of tarring them with Ms Rajalakshmi's brush.
Bharati
August 17, 2018
Report Abuse
Valid points made by @senthil.
J.Rajalakshmi
August 17, 2018
Report Abuse
thought provoking points for policy makers and farmers. thank you very much sir,
Shabil Krishnan
August 17, 2018
Report Abuse
Very informative article. One feels truly sorry for the small farmer, who has enough burdens to bear without this additional bureaucracy. The govt. has to simplify the process of certification,

Susheela Sundarraj
August 19, 2018
Report Abuse
Very informative and straightforward article. Good pts by Mr Senthil. Intellectually bankrupt piticians and western educated babus have Killedl the native system and democracy.
About a decade back an idiotic unio minister of agriculture was asked about anti farmer govt policies. He made a dishonest excuse that policies were made by bureaucrats and not ministers, hence he was not responsible. And the man happened to be the son of biggest farmer leader of the country !

Obviously, the procedure to get organic certification has been dictated by big money and big business. Why would it be cumbersome , time consuming and costly. If govt is for the people, certification agency should be going to the farmers' place at govt cost. Why would they hive it off to third parties and let middlemen make money for doing nothing ?
Secondly, what is the guarantee that these third parties themselves are not compromised ?

The Indian farmers have always been growing organic, except those under influence of multi nationals and bunkum called 'green revolution'. So actually who shoul need permission to sow and sell are those that are non organic. Right now the rules let the thief walk freely whereas an honest person has to carry a certificate and take pains to get it from agents of master thiefs.

The country can only improve when system of governance changes. Commies and congress have never been up to it. Alas, for all its Desi image, BJP fails miserably.
Ahmed
August 22, 2018
Report Abuse