India’s Transformation under Modi – Implications
by Naagesh Padmanaban on 01 Jun 2018 24 Comments

The growth in the Indian economy has attracted a lot of attention. India has emerged as the fasted growing large economy, pipping China. It is expected to clock a GDP growth rate higher than 7.2% in 2018. Many international agencies that monitor key economies around the world have been sanguine in their projections on India.

 

A recent study published by UK based Center for Economic and Business Research (CEBR) states that India’s consistent GDP growth rate will push it to prominence in 2018. It has forecast that India will join the elite group of the top five largest economies of the world. This is a full year ahead of projections by International Monetary Fund (IMF) that India will make it to the top five in 2019.

 

India’s rise to global prominence has not come easy. In the last four years, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has put in an unbelievable number of policy reforms and public investments in hundreds of projects that have borne fruit. This smorgasbord of reforms and investments has deeply impacted key sectors of agriculture, manufacturing, and services like never before. The gamut of initiatives – many of which have longer gestation periods – will continue to deliver results over an extended time horizon.

 

A dispassionate analysis throws up three key pillars that have provided the bulwark for the emergence of the economy.  Firstly, Prime Minister Modi, shedding ideological baggage, has incorporated best practices in economic management that are pragmatic and more importantly, well suited for the country. This is indeed refreshing, since for many decades India was hamstrung by ill-advised ideological paradigms that only resulted in poor growth rates and endemic poverty.

 

Secondly and more importantly, we are witness to an unparalleled excellence in executing these economic reforms and policies. Modi’s personal leadership qualities – acquired mostly as Chief Minister of Gujarat where he was virtually baptized by fire – have played an important role. The recent inauguration (May 2018) of the smart Eastern Peripheral Expressway (EPE) is but one example of this mastery over execution. Built at a cost of Rs.11,000/- crore in Delhi, this 135 km long solar power lit expressway was completed in 18 months.

 

Thirdly, and most notably, the government has ensured that, at least at the political level, there is no corruption, pilferage or fraud. These have been the core secrets of the swift economic transformation we see today. It is well known that India’s track record in delivering government services, particularly welfare benefits to the poor, has been dismal. Former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi is on record saying that for every rupee the government spent on welfare only 15 paise actually reached the beneficiary.

 

But Modi had stopped all that by directly transferring benefits to beneficiary bank accounts. According to data published by the government, welfare benefits of Rs. 3,65,996/- crore were directly transferred to beneficiaries’ accounts in the last four years (www.narendamodi.in). This is an example of Modi choosing the appropriate service delivery vehicle and executing it well in a given time frame.

 

Modi’s developmental paradigm and governance strategy are built around these three pillars. Hence, his schemes and initiatives, just to name a few - GST, Indian Bankruptcy Code (IBC), recapitalization of public sector banks, unprecedented investments in national highways and railways, 100% electrification, transfer of welfare benefits directly to the beneficiaries’ bank accounts – are runaway successes.

 

What is even more striking is the fact that the government has used existing laws, existing civil and administrative machinery, existing staff and officers to execute its vast number of projects. The same machinery has in many cases achieved the project objectives ahead of schedule, without cost overruns.

 

Like all previous governments, Modi too had the low risk option of choosing reforms on a smaller scale that do not tend to rock the boat. But these changes would have yielded only incremental results or benefits that would have continued to keep India hostage to a pernicious low growth cycle, depriving huge sections of society a decent livelihood. But Modi apparently has taken a calculated risk and has instead boldly opted to choose the transformation route, a high risk option, to achieve big results in as diverse areas as possible. The gamble, as seen from the optimistic projections by international institutions, seems to have paid off.

 

Many compare Modi’s transformation exercise to the reforms of 1991 initiated by the then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao. Rao’s reforms were no doubt extremely critical for India then, but were more in the nature of a rescue mission. They were focused on deregulation and attracting foreign direct investments to shore up dangerously low levels of foreign exchange reserves. They were incremental and definitely on a smaller scale in comparison.

 

As already pointed out, Modi’s reforms are transformational. Further his efforts must be seen as part of a master plan that includes securing India from internal and external threats as well as forging bilateral ties with various countries around the world to deepen India’s trade and commerce. The truth is that both Rao and Modi have succeeded in untethering the native economic sinews of the country.

 

Despite the din, distorted and mostly negative reporting in the media, Modi’s developmental agenda has the backing of large sections of society. For them the economic resurgence passes the smell test, at least anecdotally. For instance, in high growth states like Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, there is a noticeable absence of beggars on the streets or on railway platforms. Long gone are the days when people could not afford footwear or wore torn clothes. The so-called ‘trickle down’ effect which was a just a dribble for several decades, now seems to be drenching vast sections of poor people. Of course this is not to gainsay the fact that poverty continues to pervade vast sections of society in many states.

 

The economic survey for 2018 has highlighted the strengths of economy. But it has also warned of potential risks and threats to the economy, both internal and external, that need to be carefully watched. However, the good news is that key statistics and relevant data point to continued robust growth in the economy. Modi’s biggest achievement seems to be the setting up of right the ecosystem via a conducive policy environment, infrastructure building and massive public investments that has since unleashed the economy.

 

The silent changes that are sweeping across the country – mostly at the lowest levels of the economy – are creating huge impact on the very fabric of India – economically, politically and socially. The enthusiasm and expectations of the people – particularly the under 35 demographic segment that forms over 60% of India – seem be scaling up.

 

The clamor for corruption-free and swift delivery of government services – be it provision of electricity, sanitation, public health services or any service for that matter – is ratcheting up. While citizens’ experience is positive, this may not be a welcome change for the political ecosystem in India.

 

Modi’s iron will and mastery of execution is unmatched across the whole political spectrum in India today. He has given India’s new mantra to the political class – perform or perish. He has set the bar for performance high enough that many in the current political scene may not be able to achieve. This probably explains the collective hatred seen for Modi among his political opponents and their proxies. But the impact of Modi’s transformations will continue to reverberate for years to come. 

User Comments Post a Comment
The first concern should be the election of 2019. The opposition's spirits seem to be buoyed by the success in the recent bi-elections and developments in Karnataka.

Any BJP loss in 2019 will be a disaster for the nation.


N S Rajaram
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
"Former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi is on record saying that for every rupee the government spent on welfare only 15 paise actually reached the beneficiary."
And how much reached his Swiss account (Schweizer Illustrierte)?

"the collective hatred" - and, as recent election results show, it collects enough votes to capture power.

So what is going wrong?
Bharati
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
In any democracy the term 'nursing one's constituency' is extremely important. All these economic reforms will count for nothing if the politician doesn't 'nurse his constituency'. That is precisely what Modi and CO HAVE DONE. They have more or less kissed good bye to a most loyal constituency of the BJP for years - the Armed Forces and its Veterans. Since 'politics is perception', the perception going around in the veteran community is that of a 'hostile govt. to the Forces and its veterans'. The reasons are many. But the damage is done. Amit Shah meeting General Dalbir Suhag is of no use. Period. The next constituency that stood by the BJP is the middle class. That is eroding, if Karnataka polls is any pointer. Arun Jaitely has been a DISASTER for Modi as the FM. The next is Hindu society. The least one expected of Modi is to free Hindu temples from the clutches of BABUDOM. Nothing has happened on that front. Same for some of the injurious provisions of the RTE Act that hurt ONLY HINDU INSTITUTIONS. All this economic reforms will come to nought if the foregoing socieites press the NOTA button on the EVM in 2019.
H.Balakrishnan
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
This article is a puff piece. Much of the data produced by the government are highly questionable. For example when Modi came to power he changed the method of calculating the GDP that automatically doubled the growth rate. Using the old method, the growth rate during Modi has been around 3-3.5%. Or if you want to use the new method then you would have to double the rate under Manmohan Singh's government and admit they achieved a growth rate of 16-17%.
I run a business and I haven’t see any improvement during the Modi years. The legal system is a mess where it can take a decade or more to settle simple disputes. It is impossible to enforce a contract since the cost in legal fees will be more than the amount you hope to get. How can anyone run a business without the ability to enforce contracts.
It is also very difficult for small and medium size business to get capital for investments, especially from public sector banks which are still in a mess. At one bank, the deputy bank manager asked us to give job to his keep. When we refused, he made sure the payment of salaries through the bank was delayed. At another bank, we could not withdraw money for two weeks because they were merging their IT system with another bank.
The problem with private sector banks is they do not serve smaller companies. We like to electronically transfer the salaries to our employees, but the salaries we pay too low for the private banks so they do not do business with us. The private banks only care about the rich and ignore the small business person.
It is difficult to find honest workers. We have had workers collude with the police to extort money from us. We found out that a policeman had advised one of our workers to ask for an extra Rs. 5000 and that he would keep Rs. 1000 as a fee for putting pressure on us.
In addition to the police, there is corruption all the way from the top to the bottom, including the bureaucracy, judges, and other business people. It is so easy to always kick around politicians but the rot has spread to the entire society. It is difficult to do any business without regularly paying some bribe.
Demonetisation was a disaster that accomplished none of its stated goal. It certainly did not reduce corruption since most of black money is not kept as cash. I have also seen the number of customers for our services collapse after demonetisation. Money is now tight. Bonuses and salary increases are not what they once were. Older workers are being pushed out of their well-paying jobs in order to make room for cheaper employees in their early 20s. Job growth in general has been very weak.
The NDA government has failed to invest in education, health care (per capita we spend less than Sri Lanka and Bhutan), sanitation, and clean drinking water. Whether we like to admit it or not, for all this talk about Modi’s miracle in Gujarat, in terms of human development Gujarat still lags behind a number of states.
The agriculture sector in India is in disarray, and the government has failed to adequately spend money on this sector. We can witness the plight of farmers in Gujarat where the Patidars are fighting for reservations because farmers cannot make money through agriculture and job opportunities are few in the State.
All the benefits in Gujarat and the nation under Modi have gone predominantly to the Ambanis and Adanis of the world. Modi’s economic “reforms” have only helped the Indian super-rich and Western MNCs and VCs. The common man still suffers.
This website should stop shilling for Modi, whose record has been very weak.
Kumar
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
I remember how this website once served as a forum for Hindus to discuss their problems. Now the website has been reduced to a forum for Modi shills. Modi can do no wrong. The number of articles related to issues important to Hindus has declined. Instead we have articles written by Westerners about Syria, Russia, Venezuela, Iran, and the US. There are many other websites that do this. The number of websites that deal with Hindu issues have either shut down, or have joined the Modi bandwagon.
The shilling for Modi continues despite the fact that he has failed to do anything to help us Hindus. Has he tried to change the laws that discriminate against Hindus? Has he allowed Hindus to take control of our own temples, a right enjoyed by minorities? Look at the corruption at Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams. It should make us Hindus cry. Has he repealed Sonia’s Right To Education Act. What kind of nationalist would form an alliance in Kashmir with the PDP, a separatist party? Modi once referred to anti-cow-slaughter Hindu activists as “antisocial elements”, while referring to the stone throwing Muslim separatists in Kashmir as “misguided youth”. What happened to the repeal of Article 370? What happened to the Rama temple?
It is convenient to blame secularists, leftist, and the Congress for our problems. We should instead ask why we have been so weak and ineffective in pushing our interests, unlike the Christians, Muslims, feminists, and Communists. Why do we continue to have faith in the RSS when it has totally failed to achieve even a single victory for Hindus? Why do we vote for a BJP that once it comes to power, acts no differently than the secularists? Why do we support a party that has dismantled the Hindu revivalism movement, which was a vibrant and powerful force in the 1990s? The BJP instead wants to prove to our enemies that the BJP ideology is “real secularism”. Why has the BJP, along with the party's supporters, abandoned the concept of swadeshi? Why do we Hindus support Modi when he demolished 80 temples in Gujarat’s capital, an act worthy of Aurangzeb.
It is easy to see that the BJP will not win a majority in the next Lok Sabha elections, and during the last four years nothing has been done for Hindus. I predict the same for the next one year until the 2019 election. We will continue to be oppressed in our own country. We should not blame the MSM, Muslims, missionaries, the Congress, the left, the secularists, etc. We will only have ourselves, and our blind devotion to Modi and the BJP, to blame.
Kumar
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
@Kumar

So, to whom should we blinded Hindus devote ourselves electorally in 2019?
Bharati
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
Dear @kumar, you are welcome to write on issues close to your heart. Actually most people are reluctant to do so.
Some are satisfied with abuse. I should not say more
Editor
Editor
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
@kumar, I notice you do not want to reveal your identity.
Anyway try to do a cogent narrative out of the points enumerated above, and correspond with me

Editor
Editor
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
@Bharati
I think you miss my point. You ask who should we “devote” ourselves to. We should not devote ourselves to anyone. Devotion is for religion, not for politics. We should stop looking for some special person or party that will solve our problems. We can support leaders, but we must not fail to be critical of them when they fail or betray us. We should only be devoted to the dharmic ideals that served our nation so well throughout its history such as truth, justice, freedom, compassion, etc.
Regarding 2019, I can't predict the future, but my guess is that it will be a mess. Either the BJP will have to form a coalition with “secular” parties or a motley coalition of anti-Hindu parties will form the next government. Neither will advance the cause of Hinduism or India. The BJP has squandered their majority in the Lok Sabha and the goodwill of 2014. 2024 will be no different unless we try to answer the questions I asked above and stop trying to prop up a seriously dysfunctional BJP.
Kumar
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
The author is making fun with his articles. No meaningful stuff . Modi propoganda..

First understand that Modi is an illiterate in all aspects of administration. He is just serving a force that operates him. He cannot debate on any issues in public forum. Only high pitched orchestrated one way speech.

The only thing he had done is to destroy Aircel, Idea, and many medium corporates to be swallowed by bigger ones. As soon as he came to power, Amazon landed in big way in india and captured a sizeable chunk of economy. He destroyed all the middle class businessman, pushing them to utter loss.

There is nothing we can feel good on these 4 years of rule. and this author wants to paint a rosy picture. Please stop this propoganda stupidity
senthil
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
@ Kumar
I merely picked up words you used - "blind devotion".
"We should only be devoted to the dharmic ideals that served our nation so well throughout its history such as....." This is Gandhiniti.
We should devote ourselves to Chanakyaniti that will serve us much better. And for that we need a Chanakya for 2019. According to you, the situation is hopeless......fair enough, we should not support the BJP. So then whom should we support, or should we all just vote NOTA? Unfortunately, "dharmic ideals" cannot be listed as electoral candidates.

@senthil
"There is nothing we can feel good on these 4 years of rule" - sure, we'd be much better off under congress or samajwadi or trinamool or communist rule.
Bharati
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
A very simple and truthfully written article,making the public in general aware of the truth.Inthe absence of Modiji this our motherland will be completely destroyed by rank opportunists.That is for sure.
doraiswamy ganesh
June 01, 2018
Report Abuse
The likes of H Balakrishnan and Kumar are quick to blame Narendra Modi. What is the alternative then? Rahul Gandhi, Mayawati, Mamata and Stalin?? Let's have perspective for heaven's sake. Narendra Modi is infinitely better than anyone in the combined opposition.

H. Balakrishnan goes on like a broken record against Arun Jaitley. What's the alternative then - spineless Manmohan Singh or the now mercurial Yashwant Sinha??

N.S. Rajaram's words of caution are well taken. I do not even dispute Senthil's skepticism. That said, let's not attack the sole voice of sanity in India's political spectrum today. India would be in a dire predicament should the BJP lose the General Elections in 2019. The BJP needs to position itself in facing the opportunistic, corrupt and anti-nationalist joint opposition. While the challenge ahead is formidable, the party has no option but to do everything in its power to win. Too much is at stake otherwise for India.
Ajay Soomro
June 02, 2018
Report Abuse
@bharati
It is not Gandhiniti to support the ideals of truth, justice, freedom, and compassion. I am surprised you think so. Rejecting dharma is not Chanakyaniti. It is really Nehruniti. Rejecting dharma is what communists and secularists do.
Please do not think I am attacking you. The purpose of my posts is simply to ask questions about why we are in our current situation. I am not saying it is hopeless, but the situation is dire. Rampant corruption, sub-Saharan levels of poverty, the steady decay of our culture, the increasing conversion of Hindus are real issues. We cannot solve these through simply supporting a man or party.
I can't say I have the solution. The truth is I haven't the slightest idea. The solution can only occur through dialogue and debate among us Hindus. That is why we need less articles on Vijayvaani about global events by Westerners, and more articles by Indian intellectuals about how to solve our problems.
Bharati, you ask whom we should support in 2019. Why don't you tell us. Who should we support and why. Give good reasons to make your point. But if your point is simply that the BJP is better than the Congress, Samajwadi, Trinamool, or Communists, then the situation truly is hopeless.
Kumar
June 02, 2018
Report Abuse
@Kumar

We are a parliamentary democracy. Therefore, to select those to rule over us, we must vote. There is NOTA, which is really escaping electoral responsibility. If you do not have someone who matches your dharmic ideals, then you vote for someone in the list who is least furthest from them.
We can bemoan the situation at home or outside as much as we like. That will not change it. We must vote.
In the current scenario you have your options, and a deadline (2019). That deadline will not wait for interminable discussion about whys and wherefores.
The choice is Rahul Gandhi, Mamata Banerjee, Mayawati, Nitish Kumar, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Narendra Modi......there is no one named Dharmic Ideals.
So, whom will you vote for? Because vote you must, otherwise you have no moral right to crib about the system.
Bharati
June 02, 2018
Report Abuse
Modi and his cabinet members should hold press conferences to project
their achievements. Gadkari should be the first to give. Infact he is very cool headed.
Then there are Bofors suitcases still not opened according to a video by SSwamy when he gave spoke about Deve Gowda as PM who had bravely ordered Joginder Singh ex sleuth to bring it from Europe. They should open the boxes and say the contents. Then if this govt can bring in the Swiss accounts details of Indians, then sure this govt;s stock will go up. Both Bofors suitcase and Swiss bank accts should be made public
Hemant
June 02, 2018
Report Abuse
Here is the video on Dewa Gowda,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFNlVMbjUzw
hear from 13:45 and then after 17:14 Swamy says the boxes are still not opened. Please see and hear the video. So why the boxes are still not open?
Hemant
June 02, 2018
Report Abuse
@Bharati
I have a couple questions for you. How are we a parliamentary democracy? Just because we regularly vote does not mean we are a democracy. A parliamentary democracy is a system where the members of parliament represent the people who have voted for them. In our system each MP represents only their own selfish interests. Also we do not select those who "rule over us". We select those who will represent us and do what is in our best interest. Currently that is not the situation in our country.
Also what does "escaping electoral responsibility" mean. Why is voting NOTA an act of "escaping electoral responsibility". What do you mean when you say we should vote for someone who is "least furthest from" ideals such as truth, justice, freedom, compassion, etc. What if all the candidates are bad. According to your logic our choice should be to reject the very bad candidates and just vote for the bad candidate. Isn't it an act of escaping electoral responsibility to vote for a bad candidate. Isn't it more electorally responsible to vote NOTA.
I see nothing wrong in saying that I do not have the answers to the difficult issues I brought up. My point was always to create a discussion among us Hindus about how we must move forward. However, I find it odd that you have not answered the question I asked you: who would you support in 2019. Why are you unwilling to defend Modi or the BJP with some good arguments and reply to the issues I brought up in my earlier posts.
If you wish, I will let you have the last word, but I would like to make one more point. In 2019 Modi and the BJP will lose its Lok Sabha majority. They will have only themselves to blame. Modi may not be the PM. If he does become the PM it will be by forming an alliance with the very bad choices you mentioned: Mamata Banerjee, Mayawati, Nitish Kumar, Mulayam Singh Yadav. If you only concentrate on the 2019 "deadline" you will only be disappointed by the results.
I have enjoyed this interaction with you Bharati. Please do not take anything I said personally.
Kumar
June 02, 2018
Report Abuse
@Kumar
"I find it odd that you have not answered the question I asked you: who would you support in 2019. Why are you unwilling to defend Modi or the BJP with some good arguments and reply to the issues I brought up in my earlier posts."

Because all this theorising is a waste of time. There is no 2019 alternative yet to Modi. My preference is quite obvious from my posts. I do not need to defend Modi or the BJP. The best argument for them is that, whatever or not their merits, the others are far far worse for Hindus.

"I will let you have the last word"

You are condescendingly gracious.
Bharati
June 02, 2018
Report Abuse
@bharathi & others who ask who else if NOT modi..

What is better under modi and what will happen worse under rahul gandhi or mamata?

whoever comes, this rotten system will continue functioning and as long as it functions, we are going to be affected..



senthil
June 03, 2018
Report Abuse
The major problem with all these hindutvavaadis is that they dont have any self identity of what a nation is, and what are the rights..

On one day, these people will say we have to embrace modernism and change according to time justifying the brutal destruction of all traditional systems in india.. justifying the change unleashed by the same colonial forces who are now identified as Scientific Community..

All they want is a false sense of hindu identity re-imposed.. they dont care if our economy is plundered indirectly.. bcoz most of the hindutvavaadis dont have any idea of economy..

They dont care if our agriculture is ravaged.. they are hard core urbanites who does not care or know about what exists outside delhi or metros..

More importantly, they are so ignorant and stupid of what and how an administration should be..

If you ask any of the hindu intellectuals to write on administrative system, they will fumble.. they can only lecture about philosophical or ideological bullshit.. but cannot write coherently on power structures, administration or beurocracy or economy or any other thing..

That is the bane of india.. the so called Hindu society.. they were miserably failed by the Hindutva and HIndu organisations, and still these hindutvavaadis want to project them as savior..

If at all anyone who has to be accused / questioned it is the hindutvavaadis..
senthil
June 03, 2018
Report Abuse
India shold be ashamed of being jewel in Common Wealth.. No sane voices from hindutva circle is against common wealth.. on the other hand, they are justifying being part of common wealth.. why?

Is Hindutva a colonial creation to fool native people?

https://gginews.in/indians-ashamed-commonwealth/
senthil
June 03, 2018
Report Abuse
@senthil / Kumar

I cannot match your loquacious carping but I can sum up my position in words of one and two syllables -

THE ESSENTIAL CHOICE FOR HINDUS IN INDIA TODAY IS BETWEEN NOTA AND TINA.

You clearly prefer NOTA. I vote for TINA.
Bharati
June 03, 2018
Report Abuse
Completely agree with Kumar and senthil.We should stick to policies not the person.Modi has completely failed to work on Hindu issues.He has destroyed all the other voices who used to raise Hindu issues. Irony is that in India there is not a single organisation who bravely says we are concerned with Hindu issues. New puppet of VHP appointed by Modi gang says VHP's work is true seculrism.For larger hindu and Indian interest Modi must be out in 2019.He has become liabilities for Hindus like Gandhi in 1947.
Sanatan
June 05, 2018
Report Abuse