Jallikattu ban could lead to mass slaughter of bulls
by Senthil on 11 Jan 2015 21 Comments

With just days to go for the Pongal celebrations, there has been heavy uncertainty prevailing in Tamil Nadu on the fate of Jallikattu, Manjuvirattu and other temple festivals of the State.  The people of Tamil Nadu, particularly the southern region, have been anxiously waiting for the Central Government to take steps to overcome the oppressive and unjust ban order issued by the Supreme Court of India. They had high hopes that Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) as a nationalist party would understand the sensitivities of our age-old culture, and facilitate Jallikattu for the oncoming Pongal.

 

The situation is very critical because both PETA and the Jallikattu supporters believe that this year is the lifeline for their respective camp. If Jallikattu happens, it will be a major victory for Jallikattu supporters and rural people of Tamil Nadu, and would ensure revival of Jallikattu in subsequent years; so far it has been suppressed heavily. If it does not happen, it will be a major victory for PETA and associated animal rights groups who expect that the protest by rural people will lose momentum and gradually wither away.

 

BJP misguided to political suicide

 

The BJP seems to be doing political calculation on the Jallikattu issue. They feel that if Jallikattu does not happen, the people’s anger will turn towards ADMK and BJP can cash in on this later. This is utter stupidity. The people have a soft corner for Ms Jayalalithaa as she was arrested and dethroned, and they are well aware that she is not in a position to do anything with regard to Jallikattu. So anger will be directed towards the BJP which is currently in power at the Center.  The Dravidian parties will amplify this anger by pointing to the central government.

 

It will be political suicide for BJP in the south Tamil Nadu if Jallikattu does not happen. However, if BJP takes step to remove the ban and promotes Jallikattu in big way, it can establish a foothold in the southern Tamil Nadu, which is currently controlled by the Dravidian parties. It is pertinent that H. Raja of Tamil Nadu had issued statements that BJP will bring back Jallikattu. So people have high expectations of the BJP, and have been making arrangements to conduct Jallikattu at many places. 

 

Keeping aside these political games, few seem aware of the severe consequences of this unjust ban on Jallikattu. If the Jallikattu is not conducted during the coming Pongal festival, it will trigger the mass sale of Jallikattu bulls by farmers as they start believing that this ban is forever. It need not be said that all bulls will end up in slaughter houses, but a large number of bulls were sold when the Supreme Court ban order came in May 2014. According to rough estimates, around 20 per cent of the bulls were sold after this ban; this is more than 1000 bulls across Tamil Nadu.

 

Jallikattu bulls are maintained at high cost by farmers, exclusively for the Jallikattu. There are no returns for the amount (and effort) spent in maintaining Jallikattu bulls. They are maintained because traditional society considers it a matter of pride to send bulls to the race. Jallikattu is conducted only once in a year in each place, and each farmer gets only few minutes for the bulls to participate in this event. Banning Jallikattu will destroy the incentive that traditional society has created for the up-keep of the bulls.

 

The beef mafia is salivating at this opportunity, as there is a premium price for the beef of Indian breeds (bos indicus) in the international market. Since Jallikattu bulls are maintained well with nutritious food, the quantity and quality of its flesh is superior to hybrid cows. 

 

Jallikattu bulls are the last of the desi cattle breeds (bos indicus or zebu) in Tamil Nadu. In the past, there would be at least two to three commercial breeding bulls maintained by farmers in each village for reproduction. Artificial Insemination at cheaper rates by the government had destroyed the economic viability of these breeding bulls and led to drastic reduction in the population of uncastrated bulls across Tamil Nadu. 

 

Earlier, whenever Jallikattu was sold, it would be bought for breeding purposes due to its superior quality. But the demand for breeding bulls fell due to artificial insemination and there is no other market for these male species which can match the rates offered by beef traders. Hence, any mass sale of these bulls, due to Jallikattu ban, by default will benefit the beef industry and lead to extinction of our desi cattle breeds, and the genetic diversity of our native cattle species will be lost forever. We would be forced to depend solely on the few hundred stud bulls maintained by government, which will lead to common fatherhood of all cattle across Tamil Nadu, degrading the genetic diversity.

 

Any loss of out native species is irreversible, and will severely affect future efforts to revive these desi cattle breeds. Already, many desi cattle breeds like ongole, hallikar, vechur are at the verge of extinction. 

 

The government should recognise the utility of Jallikattu event as a self-sustaining model evolved by society for preservation and improvement of our desi cattle varieties and take steps to facilitate the exercise of Jallikattu, by removing the ban imposed on it.

 

Pongal Celebration will lose its charm without Jallikattu

 

Jallikattu, Manjuvirattu and related events are the lifeline of Pongal, without which it will lose its charm and liveliness. The soul of any society lies in its festivals and killing Jallikattu will kill traditional Tamil society itself. Can we imagine Europe without the FICA world cup or Halloween festival? Can we imagine Olympic Games without the grand celebrations with fireworks and dances?

 

Jallikattu is a Hindu Festival

 

Jallikattu is a Hindu religious festival, because all Jallikattu events are conducted as part of the temple event. In each event, all the temple bulls (called Koil Kalai) of surrounding temples are released in the arena after poojas are performed on them. These are bulls dedicated to the deities of respective temple (called divine bulls) and hence qualify for Nandi Pooja. The players in the arena worship these divine bulls and do not attempt to touch them. Even for private bulls, the owner takes it to the temple for pooja, before releasing it into the arena. So in every aspect, Jallikattu qualifies as a Hindu religious festival. 

 

There is Puranic evidence in Bhagvata Puranam and Vishnu Puranam. Sathya Naganajiti was the daughter of Kosala king Nagnajit, who declared he would marry his daughter only to the brave prince who tamed his seven ferocious bulls. Sri Krishna accepted the challenge, tamed the seven bulls, and married Naganajiti; she is the sixth of the eight principal queen consorts of Sri Krishna. The government should recognise these facts and take steps to declare Jallikattu and other events conducted in temple premises as Hindu religious festival.

 

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, enacted by the Nehruvian regime, gives rights to one community to kill cows and bulls as part of their religious rights. Yet now Hindus are being denied the right to use their own bulls for Jallikattu and other religious festivals. This is discriminatory and should be amended.

 

Cowardice and Fraud by PETA and animal rights mafia

 

The animal rights mafia had been persecuting Jallikattu for a decade. Unable to win legally, they resorted to lobbying and got lobbied Jairam Ramesh to amend the PCA act to include bulls in the list of Performing Animals in 2011. On this basis, the Supreme Court gave their harsh judgement. This is fraudulent because the definition of performing animals does not fit Jallikattu bulls. Jallikattu is not conducted for entertainment or commercial purpose. People spend their own money to organise these events as part of their temple festival. The definition of performing animals applies only to animals used in circus for entertainment purpose.

 

When laws can be modified to the whims and fancies of elite lobbies, what kind of justice is served?  

 

After the Supreme Court ban order on Jallikattu in May 2014, this author asked one animal rights activist who was instrumental in the ban as to what steps she had taken to protect the bulls that would be sold because of the ban.  She replied that it is not her responsibility to save those bulls, and the onus lay on the rural people! This is outright hypocrisy which needs to be exposed.

 

Bogus allegations

 

Animal rights activists are blindly parroting the argument of “bulls tortured in Jallikattu”, even after the accusations have been proved false. The fact that Jallikattu bulls are taken care of extravagantly all year round is deliberately ignored. When asked how come “mere five minutes of these bulls running through the arena” constitutes cruelty, they resort to stupid arguments like, “Even if it is for few minutes, it is cruelty”. When further cornered, “Are you going to send these bulls to slaughter just to avoid these few minutes of supposed cruelty?”, they become hysterical and claim, “the bulls will rest in peace forever, rather than undergoing torture in Jallikattu”.

 

The animal rights mafia could not answer many questions raised by Jallikattu supporters. When Jallikattu supporters demanded the registration number of the bulls that were allegedly tortured, they had no reply. Another fraud by the animal rights mafia is that they used old photographs (prior to 2008 events) while making their charges, and were caught red-handed when it was pointed out that after 2008 regulations all players were given uniforms, whereas the photos submitted by them had players without uniform! There are many such fraudulent practices by these mafias.

 

Jallikattu Bulls are NOT tortured

 

A normal bull has the capacity of pulling 2 to 4 tons of weight, depending on the breed and stature. After regulation of Jallikattu since 2008, just one person hangs on the hump of these bulls for few seconds. Since the weight of a person does not exceed 80 kg, hanging on to the hump for a few seconds cannot be construed as cruelty. All other accusations were removed by the regulation of the event by high court guidelines and the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act. The fact that Jallikattu organisers accepted and welcomed these regulations (even though strict), prove that they intend no harm to the bulls. 

 

Centre’s role

 

The people of Tamil Nadu had been under the sway of Dravidian parties for the past 60 years.  Because of them, Jallikattu has been projected as distinct Tamil culture, and not as a Hindu religious festival, comparable with similar animal sports in other parts of the country. With the rise of the BJP at the center and both Dravidian parties weakened in the State, the Tamil people have realised that Jallikattu is a Hindu festival and are ready to accept this in public.

 

The central government can help to overcome the ban on Jallikattu by removing bulls from the list of performing animals, as bulls in Jallikattu are used only as part of temple festivals and not for commercial or entertainment purpose.

 

It can also declare Jallikattu, Manjuvirattu and all other events conducted in temples as a religious festival.

 

Moreover, PETA is a foreign funded organisation which has no locus standi on local festivals. Their supporters in India are urban elites who associate with PETA for varied reasons; neither has any experience in maintaining bull or cows.

 

But Jallikattu supporters are rooted in our tradition and fighting for their religious and cultural rights inherited from ancestors. They have unquestionable legitimate interests in the fight for preserving and promoting Jallikattu.

 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi should consider these facts and take appropriate steps to remove the ban on Jallikattu and save the native breeds and Tamil culture from becoming extinct.  

User Comments Post a Comment
So true. I don't know why interfere with a traditional sport going on since ages. Even the Brits who banned animal sacrifice in temples didn't interfere.

Hariharan
January 11, 2015
Report Abuse
Excellent article senthil. You have exposed the cowardice of animal rights activists well.. indeed they are NOT activists, but mafia as u have rightly portrayed..
karthick
January 11, 2015
Report Abuse
Some genuine people like Radha R have been misled by the lipstick gang of Maneka and Nandita. Unwittingly she has fallen into their trap!
Venkat
January 11, 2015
Report Abuse
If bulls are to be ' mass slaughtered' because this festival is banned, one may well ask,


and this is supposedly a ' hindu' festival.

how does it advance one along the path of Dharma' righteousness' by bringing pain and suffering to an animal , who cannot defend itself????

Sounds like the Islamicist mass slaughter at their festivals.

Festivals are supposed to be a time of joy.???

Where is the joy , here?

Ravi Chaudhary
January 11, 2015
Report Abuse
Correction to the author of the article. Yes, Halloween began in Europe as a quasi religious and popular festival and was so observed for a long time in Europe and Christian North America.

However, today it is a highly commercialised event, targeting young children who are encouraged to go around asking for 'goodies' (read candy) on Halloween night. This is ofcourse, bad for the children's health.

In addition, certain anti social elements used the occasion to slip razor blades into the products and there have been accidents with that.
Children have also been attacked on Halloween night, by these same anti social elements.

My point here is : whatever the origins of these festivals, those that offend society in today's world must be looked at with a certain degree of skepticism.

In the case of jallikattu, there is one documentary which I viewed which showed only certain aspect of the fight. It looked suspiciously like a sanitised version. The bulls are treated well before the fight. Supposedly, the fighters are examined by doctors to see whether they have consumed alchohol etc.

On the face of it, it looks like a harmless sport, with young men trying their skill at holding on to the hump of the bull , without falling off.

The reality may be different. Other accounts speak of the clandestine torturing of the bulls, by puttin chilly powder in their eyes, force feeding them with locally produced alchohol etc.

I personally endorse the SC judgment which bans this sport.

Interestingly, it was the Dravidian party DMK that first teamed up with the Congress to ban the sport, or so I read in newspaper accounts.

Iravatham Mahadevan, the Dravidianist scholar, who claimed that the Indus Valley civilisation was Dravidian, also pointed out the existence of bull fighting in the Indus Valley. The seal shows a bull fight.

This may be so. Regardless of the antiquity of this 'sport' as a Hindu I find it a violation of Vedic Dharma. No animal should be subjected to humiliation and possibly torture.

Let our young men prove their heroism by engaging in other bloodless sports !

The argument that the beef industry (also to be condemned) engages in various forms of cruelty and so why not jallikaatu, is misguided.

And yes, in halal killing of the animal, it is allowed to die a slow painful death.

Does this mean that the jallikattu animal should be allowed to be terrorised, simply because it is not killed or allowed to bleed to death?

Using the euphemism that it is a 'rural sport' is no justification.
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
January 11, 2015
Report Abuse
@Vijaya Rajiva,

Instead of your rantings, You need to answer the following questions..

Animal rights mafia had lobbied jairam ramesh to amend the PCA act against jallikattu. But they did not amend it to stop cow slaughter. Why? Are you people saying slaughtering cows & bulls for beef is NOT cruelty, but a youth hanging on to the humps of the cow for few minutes in jallikattu, a cruelty?


I am asking this question since last year, but no one has answered it. Let me see, if you are answering now.
senthil
January 11, 2015
Report Abuse
@Ravi CHaudhary,

/** how does it advance one along the path of Dharma' righteousness' by bringing pain and suffering to an animal , who cannot defend itself????
**/

How do you know there is pain and suffering to the animal? have you ever reared any bulls in ur life? or atleast gone near to them?
senthil
January 11, 2015
Report Abuse
Since there is no harming of the bulls involved then how can it be called cruelty? I got this info from wikipedia-

Adult bulls may weigh between 500 and 1,000 kilograms (1,100 and 2,200 lb). Most are capable of aggressive behavior and require careful handling to ensure safety of humans and other animals. Those of dairy breeds may be more prone to aggression, while beef breeds are somewhat less aggressive, though beef breeds such as the Spanish Fighting Bull and related animals are also noted for aggressive tendencies, which are further encouraged by selective breeding.

It is estimated that 42% of all livestock-related fatalities in Canada are a result of bull attacks, and fewer than one in twenty victims of a bull attack survives.[20] Dairy breed bulls are particularly dangerous and unpredictable; the hazards of bull handling are a significant cause of injury and death for dairy farmers in some parts of the United States.[21][22][23] The need to move a bull in and out of its pen to cover cows exposes the handler to serious jeopardy of life and limb.[24] Being trampled, jammed against a wall or gored by a bull was one of the most frequent causes of death in the dairy industry prior to 1940.[25] As suggested in one popular farming magazine, "Handle [the bull] with a staff and take no chances. The gentle bull, not the vicious one, most often kills or maims his keeper".[26]

It clearly tells us that bulls are aggressive by nature just like most men. So it is only natural for them to take out their aggression in this harmless manner. Otherwise it would be difficult for the cattle family. If SriKrishna has shown the way then where is the problem? NaMo is perhaps going to give in to the lure of black money that they will need to finance their party activities and not be able to do the needful in any area, by the looks of it. Even the censor board is going to remain same. Hindus should start a parallel govt. just like the Muslims have their fatwa board etc. Its time to be unreasonable and un-co-operative. Trying to be too nice to nasty people never works.

Even on sunrise radio, London most of the presenters talk pro-muslim, use urdu/arabic words and have heavily promoted PK. People were repeatedly bombarded with message that nothing is wrong with PK and even judge has said so. The presenter says 'walah habibi' every few seconds as well practically every day! Which part of this prejudice do people not understand?
Premkumar
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
Clearly people who support the ban have either (1) Never raised a cow (let alone a bull) in their life or (2) Are victims of propaganda or (3) Acting on vested interests.

Chilli powder and green chillis are stuffed into the eyes of cattle taken to slaughter, loaded into trucks.

Yesterday, for about 10 minutes, I pulled my cows tail, two of us pulled its nose rope from either side to reign it in place, one of us opened its mouth and pulled out its tongue. What do u call this? - Ambush, torture???? Duration of this lasted more than Jallikattu duration. We were 4 of us ambushing this cow....

Few months back, 3 of us pinned down my 6 month old female calf for 1/2 hour- its hind legs were tied up. One of us on top of it pinning it down. Ambush, torture, cruelty, barbaric.... use any superlative term you want to..... people who don't have the slightest clue as how to rear livestock....

If not for the above two incidents both would have died!!!! So going by the activist's logic of Jallikattu- I should not inflict the above on my cows but should let them die!!! (the tongue was pulled out to administer medication for botulism and the calf's fore-leg was stitched up for a deep cut)

And for all those who think we are using barbaric methods instead of sophisticated western ones - reigning in cattle by pulling and twisting tails is exactly what is taught in US vet schools!( tail docking and cauterization are most barbaric- im not even talking about slaughter)

Heights of idiocy!
Nikky
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
From tamizh news channels, I came to know that the state govt is making efforts to conduct jallikkattu. How? I am not able to understand when Supreme Court has given its judgment against it.

Dr.Vijaya, please don't generalise or stereotype instances of torture on jallikkattu bulls. The sort of incidents like putting mirchi powder into the eyes of bulls et al et al which have been reported in the media can not be a yardstick for stereotyping to show that all bull owners indulge in such cruel acts.

And by vedic dharma...........if someone injects absolute jina ahimsa ..... to equate it with vedic dharma......... thats wrong. I do not wish to start back the topic right from the beginning. Enough has been discussed on this topic in this website.
krishnakumar
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
@Krishnarjun,

We may have to re start the debate simply because Hindu society is at a crossroads. My own view is that going back to the drawing board has become a necessity, and I am inclined to return to the wisdom of our Rishis. The sort of rubbish that one sees in news channels against the Hindu perspective (as one commentator above has said) is mainly owing to the fact that thanks to the colonial paradigms (aided by the Left/Liberals) Hindu society has become confused with its own identity.

Merely calling it a 'rural sport' does not let its advocates off the hook.
Reading some of the comments above one gets the impression that since cattle driven to slaughter (beef industry) also have chilly put into their eyes, it is okay to do that for jallikattu also.

Does this make sense ?

One of the arguments used by advocates is that if jallikattu is banned then the bulls will be sold for beef slaughter. Why ?

As Ravi Chowdhary (above) asks : is this a Hindu festival then ? Can it be that the farmer is so bankrupted that he has to sell his cattle because jallikattu has been banned ? Or is it that certain vested commercial interests are at play here ?

The logic of the advocates seems to be : let's have jallikattu (with all its cruelty to animals) in order that a greater evil does not fall on them, i.e. being taken to slaughter.

I could be persuaded if in fact, the practice once upon a time, was without cruelty and was merely a sport. Young men simply hung on to the bull without being thrown or gored etc.

But is that what is happening today ? I think not. Forcefully opening the bull's mouth to pour needed medicines for its ailments is one thing, but to forcefeed it with arack is another matter. The latter is done, along with chilly in the eyes, to inflame the animal further and hence give a bigger fight.

Presumably, this will also increase the enthusiasm of the young man who wants to be heroic !
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
@ Dr.Vijaya

This is Krishnakumar and not Krishnarjun.

Hope you would agree that absolute jina ahimsa is something different from Ahimsa as prescribed in vedas. Dharma is what is derived from shruti and not what is inferred from one's own perception or whims and fancies (As prescribed by PM which is acceptable to thrimathas).

If I remember properly, I am dead against the propoganda to name this temple related religious event as a SPORT and name the participating bulls as PERFORMING ANIMALS. Although, there is ENTERTAINMENT VALUE ALSO this is PREDOMINANTLY TEMPLE EVENT. it is absolutely wrong to portray this event as SPORT.

The vedic asirvachana says, dhAnyam, dhanam, paSum, bahuputhralabham............The wealth of cattle is vedic wealth. And so all the rituals which are conducted in our villages with this wealth are in a way vedic. The references in Shrimad Bhagavata with respect to Dhanur yaga and Shri Krishna taming the bulls are pointers to this end.

In one of your articles when you brought the village worshipping padhatis also under the broader umbrella of vedic dharma........ I had initial reservations........... but after further discussions from your end....... saw logic in your version.

Here, a bull which has to participate in this sort of a temple ritual would sure have reasonable pain inflicted upon it. What is reasonable pain and what is cruelty is best left to the society of bull owners of villages........... and a REVIEW COMMITTEE OF HONORABLE COURT.

I am sure that no passionate bull owner would ever agree with putting mirchi powder into the eyes of bulls or feeding it with desi arrack.

It is good that if the govt of the day intervenes to allow this event. Even if there are any obstacle, it is the solemn duty of village elders to convince the bull owners ............ NOT TO SELL THEIR CATTLE. The issue shall be taken up seriously with govt and the event shall continue to be conducted in future.

And most important............ the situation should not be like that of now ............ now ........... now itself .........or never...........

I think this issue should have been debated and settled with Government (both central and state) atleast in the beginning of December.

lets hope for the best.
krishnakumar
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
Jallikattu is a tradition or culture or whatever it is.

As am having 25 cows and bull in my farm and daily to handle the bulls and cows and new born calves we need jallikattu.

Some old fellow who is well experienced with Kangeyam cows told me Cows can sense the adrenal rush inside humans when we go near them.

if we scared of cows then they will try to charge u as they determine us as enemy and who is weak.

so control the adrenal rush we need bulls and to save the bulls we need jallikattu.

if someone get ban from supreme court dat "all human shouldnt use their right hand to eat " then everyone should follow that?

how single person can determine the 1000s of year culture.

so supreme court judge is the god of the country ?

so he can decide whom should do what and when?

is this a important case to ban?

idiots we have so many things to be banned.
Sara Durai
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
PETA= SHIT

PETA is the only reason for the bulls sent to the slaughter house after the ban.

600villages and millions of people who are supporting jallikattu and saving bulls and a single organization wont he case??

1 is bigger than 600 or Millions?

money plays many things.

USD can never hide SUN
Sara Durai
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
@Krishnakumar

Thankyou for the correction to your name and apologies for the same.

Yes, I agree that cattle is referred to as Vedic wealth. Neverthless, I may have missed it, but in the Veda proper I did not see any reference to bulls being used in the way they are used in jallikattu.

By Veda I mean, the 4 Vedas (Rig, Yajur, Sama, Atharva) plus the Brahmanas and the Upanishads. What smriti says, is subject to interpretation, as you rightly point out.

As I recall, Manusmriti is quite stern about the ill treatment of cattle.

Yes, all this should have been resolved a long time ago by state and Centre. Today's advocates use two arguments : 1. it is an ancient sport, 2. jallikattu is necessary for the economic welfare of the village.

I have to go back and check the Indus Valley seal that Iravatham Mahadevan refers to as evidence of jallikattu in that period. As you well know he is a Dravidianist and has reportedly said publicly that he is not a Hindu.

I wonder if there is some Dravidianism being unneccessarily injected into the debate in order to split Hinduism. As you already probably know, this is part of the Aryan debate, which has now been settled conclusively by Indic scholars.

Recently, some of us in private emails discussed the horrific slaughter of animals in Nepal (some 200 thousand)during the Gadimai festival. Some claimed that this was an ancient ritual for the goddess. However, others pointed out that this was started only some 200 years ago by a foolish ruler who saw a dream in which the goddess called upon him to make animal sacrifice. To my knowledge, the Devi never asks for bloodletting. She is always benign and appears in a horrific dimension only when slaying evil doers (Devi Mahatmyam).

We Hindus have Adi Shankara's Sri Yantra. It is said that during this worship the Devi appears in her benign form to the worshipper. There is no request for bloodletting.

A very learned and authentic Sanskritist in our midst Dr. B. K. Shastri wrote for our information a short analysis of the etymological history of the word 'yajna' which ruled out any blood letting as part of the Vedic sacrifice (in ancient times).

This had been my position also (although I am not a Sanskritist). At any rate this interesting exchange was put for public reading by the editor of Bharata Bharati.com at the conclusion of an article on Gadimai. I cannot recall the exact title of the article but the reference is clearly there and you can't miss it. This was only about two or three weeks ago. The homepage will give you the list of articles.

Let us hope for the best, as you say.
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
@vijaya Rajiva,

Want to point you that You have not answered my question i asked in previous comment.
senthil
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
@vijayarajiva,

You can have the freedom to have any ill-conceived stereotyped notions.. but you cannot universalise it for whole of bharath or world.

The bulls are NOT tortured in jallikattu. Full Stop. No cruelty there. The animal rights mafia just built up a false allegations through propoganda, and then used their power center and lobby to get their ban..

Similarly the animal sacrifice.. you dont have any bloody rights to question them, because you dont belong to that part of region or that part of society. You are NOT master of the society or dictator of that society..



senthil
January 12, 2015
Report Abuse
it is learnt that central govt has lifted the ban on jallikkattu. thats what I happen to know from many sources? How they had done it? is it true? Is jallikkattu would take place in all the places as part of the temple rituals this time around?
krishnakumar
January 14, 2015
Report Abuse
@krishnakumar,

BJP had assured to lift the ban on Jallikattu. But with Maneka Gandhi's most idiotic statement today, we come to understand the lobbies which had been in force controlling BJP at centre all these days.

I had this doubt two weeks back, as RR did not bark in any of the magazines demanding enforcement of ban, which means she has been very sure that BJP is not going to lift ban.

Krishna is watching all these, and she & her coterie will pay for their sins both in this life and her after life.
senthil
January 17, 2015
Report Abuse
@krishnakumar

I seriously doubt whether the Central government will go against the SC judgment.

It is time that the advocates of jallikattu start strategising on how to save the bulls from the beef industry.

One solution is to actively work for the banning of cow slaughter. India is now the largest exporter of beef. It used to be Brazil.
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
January 17, 2015
Report Abuse
@vijaya Rajiva,

/** It is time that the advocates of jallikattu start strategising on how to save the bulls from the beef industry.
**/

First answer the question i had asked many times before and then you can issue sermons..
senthil
January 17, 2015
Report Abuse