Indo-Pacific rebalancing game prompts India-US defence cooperation
by Ashok B Sharma on 27 Aug 2014 4 Comments

The US policy of rebalancing the Indo-Pacific region has made the superpower seek reliable allies in the region. The emerging economy and political power in the region, India, with its strategic location, has come as a best bet for US.

 

With India recently hiking the cap on the entry of foreign direct investment (FDI) in defence sector from 26 per cent to 49 per cent, the US views it as an unique opportunity. The India-US Defence Trade and Technology Initiative (DTTI) inked two years ago when the UPA government led by Dr Manmohan Singh was in power, has come in handy to further the defence engagements between the two countries.

 

The DTTI, which was presented by the then US Defence Secretary Leon E Panetta and subsequently shepherded by the then US Deputy Defence Secretary Ash Carter, has on its agenda proposals for co-production and co-development. The Modi Government which is aggressive in its effort to modernise the Indian Defence Industry by liberalising its FDI policy is seeking to take the DTTI forward. The Indian Defence Minister Arun Jaitley and the US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel, who was recently on a three-day visit to India, agreed to extend the New Framework for the US-India Defence relationship well before it expires in July 2015.

 

Mr Jaitley, however, is hopeful that the cooperation would result in increased indigenisation capabilities of the Indian defence industry through co-production and co-development. He has said: “The development of our own indigenous capabilities is a major objective that guides our present policies. In this direction, we have taken steps to raise the FDI cap in the defence sector. We look forward to work closely with the US in this regard.” The FDI policy has stipulated that that the projects will have full Indian management and control.

 

Technology transfer is the key to modernisation and Mr Jaitley might note the words of Ash Carter who said earlier: “We’ve adapted our system in ways that will speed our release process for India… especially in the Department of Defence, recognising that for all partners this process is subject to case-by-case review and there will always be some technologies that we will keep to ourselves.” This means that India will not receive some key sensitive latest technologies.

 

There are other issues like relaxation in US export control regime, licensing agreements, licence exceptions, end-use monitoring which need to be sorted out by both sides.

 

However, Hagel said that DTTI now has on the table over a dozen specific cooperative proposals that would transfer significant qualitative capability, technology and production know-how. “To build a broad foundation for co-development, and because both our nations hone the leading edge of scientific and technological innovation, we are also working together to advance our joint cooperative science and technological priorities. This includes areas ranging from big data to cognitive sciences to chemical and biological defence and material sciences,” he has said.

 

Other items on the table for co-production and co-development are maritime helicopter, naval gun, surface-to-air missile system and scatterable anti-tank system.

 

Mr Hagel has reiterated that India and US would co-produce and co-develop the next generation Javelin anti-tank missile. “This is an unprecedented offer that we have made only to India and no one else,” he said. Javelin is a man-portable, fire-and forget, anti-tank missile employed by dismounted infantry to defeat current and future threat armoured combat vehicles.

 

While for the Javelin project US will partner only with India, there are several other defence projects US have with other countries, particularly Australia, a strategic country in the Indo-Pacific region and with UK. To quote Mr Carter, “We’ll ensure that those innovative projects receive priority funding. This is an approach we’ve only ever taken with the United Kingdom and Australia and now India will join that company.”

 

Mr Hagel did not fail to spell out the US game of rebalancing. While he was in Delhi at a public lecture at Observer Research Foundation, he said: “But today, as India ‘Looks East’ and the United States ‘rebalances’, our interests across the full span of the Indo-Pacific region are aligning more closely than ever.”

 

Another aspect that draws US closer to India in defence cooperation is the growing Indian market. Since 2008, over $9 billion in defence contracts have been signed between US and India compared with less than $500 million for all the years before. This makes US one of the top three defence suppliers to India after Israel and Russia.

 

In March 2009, the Obama administration cleared $2.1 billion sale of eight P-8 Poseidon aircraft to India that are patrolling the shores of the Andaman & Nicobar Islands. During President Obama’s visit to India in November 2010, US signed $5 billion agreement to supply Boeing C-17 Globemaster III military transport aircraft and general electric F414 engines. US also agreed to supply six C-130 J Super Hercules special operations aircraft. US is also mulling sale of 22 Apache attack helicopters, 15 Chinook heavy lift helicopters, 145 ultra light howitzers, M777 guns of BAE systems.

 

However, Mr Hagel has spelt out that in rebalancing game in Indo-Pacific region, US would have “a constructive relationship” with China and “seek to manage competition, but avoid traps of rivalry” and at the same time India-US-Japan trilateral security cooperation should be elevated to ministerial level building upon the joint naval Malabar exercise.

 

India-US defence relations are waiting to take final shape when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi meets US President Barack Obama for a summit level meeting in Washington in September and subsequently the Indian Defence Minister Arun Jaitley visits the Pentagon in October this year.

User Comments Post a Comment
Excellent piece
Ginni
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
wonderful and informative article..
raj
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
The utube connection given above about Rwanda does not work. See the site below. Good information.

http://faculty.vassar.edu/tilongma/Church&Genocide.html

Conclusions of the above article

Given the facts that I have presented, it should be clear that the failings of the Rwandan churches during the genocide were not the result of a few corrupt individuals but rather were deeply rooted in the very nature of Christianity in Rwanda. The manner in which Christianity was implanted in Rwanda and the policies and ideas promoted by missionaries began a transformation of Rwandan society that ultimately made genocide possible. After independence, the churches stood as important centers of social, economic, and political power, but rather than using their power to support the rights of the population, the churches were integrated into wider structures of power that allowed wealth and privilege to become concentrated in the hands of a select few. The churches as institutions worked with the state to preserve existing configurations of power in the face of increased public pressure for reform, ultimately culminating in the strategy of genocide. While never publicly endorsing genocide, the churches nevertheless are complicit because they helped to create and maintain the authoritarian and divided society that made genocide possible and because the entanglement of the churches with the state made the churches partners in state policy. People could thus kill their fellow Christians on church property and believe that their actions were consistent with church teachings. The complicity of the churches in the genocide is not merely a failing of Christianity in Rwanda, but of world Christianity as it has established itself in Africa, and it should lead people of faith throughout the world to question the nature of religious institutions and the ways in which they exercise their power.
Peepal
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
Excellent article.. but do you have any evidence to claim that top leaders of LTTE are christians? I have debated this with few people, but they say, prabhakaran was a devotee of God Muruga.. and he named his son as "Charles Antony" to honor one of the martyrs..
senthil
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
Excellent analysis. Wish all Hindu and pseudo secular politicians read this. Who will make these jokers see the truth?
Only thing is I could not find the video from the link given in the article: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjHASCTxQlY. U-tube says it has been removed
patnaikt
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
Either the person who wrote this stuff got some vested interest in misleading people or just living in a imaginary world.

This is probably the silliest piece I read on LTTE recently.
Kaliyugan
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
@Kaliyugan : Instead of dismissing the article rudely, can you please educate the rest of us as to WHY you think this is a 'silly'... 'silliest' piece? Do you have evidence contrary to what the writer says? Well then...out with it.
pvas
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
@pvas: I am sorry I didnt mean to be rude.

Firstly, I dont have any evidence to prove that most of the leaders mentioned here were actually Hindus. Its a fact mate, I come from there I know it.

Secondly, there was an organization called "Kalai Panpaadduk Kalagam" which heavily promoted Tamil culture and arts among the Tamils in LTTE territory and Tamil Diaspora.

I cant be even bothered to read this article in full. Anyway good luck to you saviours of Hinduism and Tamils.
Kaliyugan
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
Timely analyses and sum ups. For many unrests in Tamilnadu, the Missions/Church alone is responsible it is clear. Please send some proof to the Indian Govt. and also publish it so that the real colours of the so called Tamilian Dravidian parties are made known and their Tamil masks torn out.
Soma Visal
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
Of course LTTE is a xtian organisation, but it came into prominence only in 1983

But that is only half of the story

The other half is buddhist fascism

Many North Indians like Sandhya Jain are focused on the jihadi and evangelical menace and fail to realise that Buddhism is also a threat

In Bhutan, the buddhist king expelled its 15% Hindu population

In Myanmar, in the 1930s buddhist monks did anti-Hindu riots,
In 1960, the Myanmar buddhists ethnic cleansed its 15% Tamil Hindu population. 3 million Hindu tamils still live in Myanmar, but they have to declare themselves buddhists on the census
The ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Myanmar is actually more than in Bangladesh

The Sinhalese have a long history of treachery, preceding LTTE by 1000 years.

In the Chach Namah, it says that the Sinhalese buddhist king gave money to Mohammed Bin Kasem to invade Sindh, due to trade disputes with Rajah Dahir

Sirimavo Bandaranaike was a personal friend of Indira Gandhi and in 1971, Indian troops were sent to save her from JVP, a naxalite uprising. But by June 1971, the same ungrateful Sinhalese were helping Pakistan ship troops and weapons to crush the Bangladeshis. Amazingly Indira Gandhi, usually very hard headed, donated Kacha Theevu Island, that had been ruled by the Setupati of Ramnad.

In 1986, to counter Indian pressure on devolution, John Garver clearly documents that Jayawardene personally asked Chinese PM, Deng, to invade India and Deng refused

In 1983, Jayawardene was in negotiations with western countries to lease out Trincomalee as an anti-Indian naval base

In riots in 1937, 1959, 1977, Buddhist monks were leading anti Tamil and anti-Hindu riots. where brahmin priests were burned alive. and pregnant Hindu tamil women disembowelled. In 1959, Rajaji condemned these riots

In 1981, Sinhalese army burned down the Tamil Hindu museum at Jaffna

In 1964, Sirimavo, declared 1 million Indian Tamils, ( not Jaffna Tamils ) as stateless and the idiotic North Indian, Lal Bahadur Shastri accepted back half of them

The Sinhalese have a long history of cheating and being dishonest with treaties they signed

They refused to implement the Bandaranaike-Chelvanayagam pact, which they had signed

They refused to implement the 13th amendment ,which they had signed

So why the hatred. The answer is there is no such thing as a Sinhalese. They are simply South Indian buddhists and Oriya Buddhists who fled India during the Hindu bhakti revival and just like Indian muslims use Urdu, these buddhists used Sinhalese language, as a cultural identifier

The tamil epic Manimekalai is actually set in Sri Lanka and describes the place as full of tamil buddhists. There are no tamil buddhists left. They all transformed into Sinhalese

The solution is that when an Indian govt with backbone arises , is to reabsorb Sri Lanka into India. The Nayaka Kings of Sri Lanka were Nayaks sent by the Madurai Nayak dynasty





Shan
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
Absolutely right! And DMK and Karunanidhi are also church stooges.
Note also that LTTE website still carries the Aryan-Dravidian nonsense, as does DMK.
Rajaram
April 04, 2013
Report Abuse
LTTE has run also in support of Super rich sri lankan tamils who live in canada,america and London and if a situation is settled in Sri Lanka they have to return to Sri Lanka leaving their super rich life style and LTTE equally killed Tamil people as equal as SRI LANKAN army. SRI LANKA is called a friendly state which joins hands with china and pakistan which are india's biggest threat states.500 Indian Fisher men has been kiled by SRI LANKAN navy(Even Pakistan has killed only 2 fisher men is last decades).So India's job is to give equal rights to SRI LANKAN tamils and make them to lead their life peacefully atleast here after.
Adithya Shankar
April 05, 2013
Report Abuse
Whether Prabakaran was Hindu or Christian is immaterial. It is beyond doubt that he carried out the Church's agenda. No doubt "Tamil Eelam" is a Christian agenda. However, we must also be aware of the fact that Sinhala Chauvinism has also played a role in the Sri Lankan Tamil crisis. It is a huge task to make the Buddhists understand the nefarious designs of the Church and the need for Hindu-Buddhist unity. For that to happen, India must have a Hindu Nationalist Government.


It is quite obvious that the author has taken a lot of points from some of the columnists from Vijayvaani itself :-) Nevertheless, she has done a good job.
Harsh
April 05, 2013
Report Abuse
@HARSH - agree with all your points hundred per cent; the neo colonial agenda of further splitting up countries is well and truly on
Appu
April 05, 2013
Report Abuse
Excellent and timely article ! One commentator said that Tamil cultural was promoted by the Church in Sri Lanka and therefore there is no truth in this article.

Actually, there is no contradiction here. Inculturation is one of the tactics the Church uses. Cultural aspects are encouraged to promote Christianity. For instance, in the South Indian dance the Kalakshetra in Chennai ( whose director used to be a non Hindu) the Christian themes are introduced during the performance.

In Kerala, the Hindu themes are subverted and a Christian message is cleverly substituted.
Dr.Vijaya Rajiva
April 05, 2013
Report Abuse
A brilliant study. some may recall that I had written an article along similar lines for Eternal India but without the wealth of detail that the author has provided.
The Vatican believes that with the collapse of Christianity in Europe, and the expansion of Islam there, making India substantially if not entirely Christian is vital for its survival. Christians have neither the will power nor the manpower to fight encroaching Islam in its European home. Christianity lost Jerusalem in the first millennium and Constantinople in the second. Its leaders fear it will be Rome's turn next, in the third millennium.
Even if they succeed in turning India into a Christian state, it will not save Christianity. As I pointed out in a book -- Conversion, Assault on Truth - the effect of Christianization is to destroy culture and destruction of the Kshatra (warrior) spirit. It is this Kshatriya spirit that will be eliminated if India becomes a Christian state.
Rajaram
April 05, 2013
Report Abuse
Just look at Latin America and the Philippines. Their native cultures have been destroyed by centuries of Christian rule. Contrast them to the U.S., Canada and Australia that have secular constitutions. What christian agents are doing in India is trying to advance Christian interests in the guise of 'Secularism', while using Muslims as their front line. This will backfire, but it may be too late.
The Hindus by then may have been too weakened to protect the effete Christian leadership. (Can one imagine their favorite leader Rahul Gandhi protecting the threatened Christians?)
The Philippines is a particularly interesting example. Before it became a Spanish colony it was culturally as rich as Thailand, Cambodia and Indonesia. Today, it is a cultural desert-- little more than a brothel of the Far East.
Goa is not much better. Only time we hear about it is in connection with some atrocity or scam. The most noteworthy episode in its colonial history was the Goa Inquisition.
LTTE is an example of what a Brown Christian state is likely to be - like Mameluke (slave) dynasties that overthrew their masters but became more ruthless and unscrupulous tyrants.
Rajaram
April 05, 2013
Report Abuse
The tragedy of Nepal is more serious than that of Hindu Tamils.Missionaries funded the the so called Maoists,but in reality church foot soldiers, to the brim.First,they used one of the sons of king Birendra to slaughter the the entire Hindu royalty.Then an anarchy was created and these so called Maoists would not allow the lone Hindu kingdom to continue.The moment the King was removed hundreds of Churches have sprung up.From near zero,nearly 10% of population has become Christian,all under the so called Maoist rule.So,LTTE or Maoists in Nepal or Odisha are all front people of the Church.India under a staunch Catholic,Sonia, is damn afraid to talk about the perfidy of the Church.
S.S.Nagaraj
April 06, 2013
Report Abuse