Deficit control through deception
by Virendra Parekh on 25 Jan 2014 3 Comments
If finance minister P Chidambaram were in charge of preparing accounts of a corporate entity, his own officers would possibly have charged him with malicious manipulation and misrepresentation. High handedness, sleight of hand, deception, plain unfairness - anything goes, if only he can get that magic figure for fiscal deficit. The finance minister has made it clear time and again that he would not allow fiscal deficit to cross the budgetary limit of 4.8 per cent of the GDP, defining it as a red line that would not be crossed. Such a commitment to fiscal discipline would ordinarily merit commendation, but the manner Mr. Chidambaram is going about it can only create disgust and misgivings.

 

Now he is a man in hurry. Somewhere in the middle of February, the government would be presenting a Vote on Account, which will contain a rough estimate of the government revenue, expenditure and deficit for the current fiscal year. Investors, domestic and foreign, financial markets and credit rating agencies are keeping a close watch on the government’s finances. Overshooting the deficit limit would undermine the government’s and finance minister’s credibility, which they can ill afford with elections ahead.

 

As things stand today, there is little hope of respecting the red line. Three quarters of the financial year have gone, and the tax revenue is way below the budget estimates. At the end of December 2013, the gross tax revenue, before allocation to states, was Rs 7.7 lakh crore, about 62 per cent of the budgeted Rs 12.36 lakh crore. Amid slowing economy, total collection of indirect taxes - excise, customs and service tax - stood at about Rs. 355,003 crore during the first nine months (April-December) of 2013-14 as against the target of Rs. 5.65 lakh crore for the whole year. The net direct tax collections after refunds were Rs. 4.15 lakh crore in April-December 2013 as against the budget estimate of Rs. 6.7 lakh crore for the whole year. In fact, by November 2013 the government had exhausted 94 per cent of the fiscal deficit limit it had set for the whole year.

 

Realising that it is impossible to meet the deficit target in the ordinary course of things, the government is looking for shortcuts. Squeezing cash rich public sector companies is one such option. Coal India owned 90 per cent by the government has announced an interim dividend of Rs. 29 per share or 290 per cent. The company will pay out a total of Rs. 18,317 crore; Rs. 16,489 crore of that will go to the government - which will also levy a dividend distribution tax of 17 per cent, meaning that its total revenue from the transaction is around Rs. 19,600 crore. CIL is sitting on cash reserves of Rs. 67,000 crore.

 

Now, the government as majority shareholder certainly has the prerogative to raise the dividend payout. But is the decision in the long term interests of the company? Coal, which literally powers the Indian economy, is in short supply. It has to be imported in large quantities at a huge cost, although the country is sitting on billions of tonnes of reserves. Coal shortage has impacted production of power and hit industrial growth. Coal India as India’s monopoly coal miner has responsibilities for the future. Its primary job is to increase production of coal and productivity by bringing new mines under operation and investing in more efficient technologies. Coal India has signed several fuel supply agreements and some environmental clearances have just come through. If it has to scale up its operations or alternatively, buy coal abroad to meet guarantees, it would need cash. 

 

It is now likely that other cash-rich PSUs - the National Minerals Development Corporation, for example, which had cash reserves of Rs 22,500 crore as on 30 September - might be subject to the same pressures to disburse cash to the government.

 

Even more objectionable is the decision to sell 10 per cent equity stake of Indian Oil to ONGC and Oil India Limited. Since both ONGC and Oil India are government-owned, this merely means siphoning off their cash balances into the government’s coffers. This is in addition to the huge direct subsidies that ONGC and Oil India pay to Indian Oil for selling diesel, kerosene and cooking gas well below cost to consumers. This government-sanctioned cheating of investors in ONGC and Oil India constitutes corporate mis-governance of the highest order.

 

There is scant regard for the fact that cash resources and other assets of public sector enterprises are meant to fund their own growth and capital requirements, and not to bridge the budget deficit.

 

Finance ministry officials are reportedly asking companies to pay higher advance tax in March 2013 and claim refund later. The ministry plans to defer payment of oil subsidies worth Rs. 60,000 crore to the next fiscal year. There is also a move to withhold big income tax refunds payable to high net worth individuals and corporations. All this will serve the twin purpose: It will help the present government to show a lower fiscal deficit, whereas the next government will be burdened with the old baggage.


Still, Mr. Chidambaram shall not be able meet his fiscal target unless he cuts capital spending. There the finance ministry has ordered large spending cuts, amounting to as much as 30 per cent in some cases, for several ministries. The burden will be borne by ministries of rural development, power, water resources and HRD. In other words, the axe will fall on plan or development or capital expenditure, essential to fuel growth.

 

In short, additional expenditure is being rolled over to the next financial year, while tax and dividend income to accrue next year is being brought forward into this year’s books. Cash balances of public sector companies are siphoned off to the government’s coffer as revenues from disinvestment. Future growth is sacrificed for current expediency. Is this deficit control or deception?

 

There is a method in this madness. The UPA government is following the scorched earth policy to make life harder for the successor government. It has already introduced populist laws on food security and land acquisition, which no party can dare oppose in an election year. Then there is a series of executive actions with the same intentions. The rural development ministry is planning to hike NREGA wages even more than what was previously planned. It has also sought to increase pensions paid under the social welfare schemes, especially under the National Social Assistance Programme. These measures may not fetch too many extra votes for the ruling party, but will make life tough for the next government which will have to implement them. The sooner this government leaves the better for the country.

User Comments Post a Comment
Sir, Excellent presentation of facts. The Defence Capital Expenditure has also been HIT !! Rs. 7970/= crore has been cut from the Capital Expenditure Budget. Result : The I.A.F. already down from a sanctioned strength of 44 squadrons is down to about 36 squadrons, will have to wait for the NEXT GOVT. to sign the Rafale Deal. In the interim, the MiG 21's are being phased out !! We are all aware of the former Army Chief Gen. V.K. Singh's letter to the 'I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE' - PM ! Status Quo Ante as far as the Army goes ! Navy's submarine strength is ALARMING, to say the very least. Bravo St. Antony. And now this 'sleight of hand' from P.C. Nothing surprising. Fully agree - THE EARLIER THIS UPA=2 is 'BOOTED OUT UNCEREMONIOUSLY, THE BETTER FOR THE NATION'. Regards
Capt.(retd) H.Balakrishnan,I.N.
January 25, 2014
Report Abuse
For the last nine years IAF has become the most corrupt department in the Defence ministry. There is no transparency in defense procurements and specifications are being changed to favor one company. The only criterion is how to get more commission from the suppliers. In the process IAF is jeopardizing national security, the economy and human lives. Mr Karnad has not covered some very important points. I do agree with what Karnad said: “The conjoined MK-ii Tejas-Super Sukhois option will make Rafale redundant, and is the reason why those Indians who have pocketed French baksheesh (which totals a very hefty sum indeed) will resist it." He is not equating LCA with MMRCA. Why do we require MMRCA?. Sukhoi Su-30MK I is one of the best planes in the world. in that range. So Sukhoi Su-30MK I with better BVR missile will be better than MMRCA to fight with Pakistan F-16 equipped with best available BVR missile in the world. .As far as I know, the ability of any fighter air craft can be enhanced by using beyond visual range missiles.In future the air superiority can be achieved by using better range BVR missiles. That is what exactly Pakistan has done. . Pakistan air Force has recently purchased 500AIM -120C-5 AMRAAM BVR missiles from USA for its F-16. This missiles credited with range 105 kilometers. I find Pakistan is more judicious in purchasing defense equipment and have better planning. than India. At present IAF is using the missile R-77 (Russian make ), which has a range of up to 80 kilometers. Why IAF is concentrating on MMRCA rather than equipping our fighter air crafts with better BVR than spending billions of dollars on Rafale, . Now IAF issues RFI for long range BVR missiles. All these actions expose the 'credibility' of IAF. We can become a developed country only if we can produce defense equipments indigenously.. When our scientists can develop deadly Brahmos supersonic cruise missiles , what is the difficulty to improve Astra(missile) equivalent to American AIM-120D AMRAAM BVR missiles, which can achieve a range of more than 105 kilometers. So with the BVR missiles which Pakistan has purchased, they can eliminate one Indian plane and two pilots ( Rafael requires two pilots) . India should have spent the amount it is going to spend on Rafael, to develop BVR missiles and pilot- less(unmanned) air crafts to replace old air crafts.
Govindan
January 26, 2014
Report Abuse
Chidambaram was busy in scams, one scam in which NDTV and chidambaram are involved is not informedto genral public by mediaNDTV & Chidambaram Accused of Money Laundering Scam of Rs. 5500 cr.
IT Commissioner SK Srivastava’s Battle against Thwarted Probe into Hawala & Tax Evasion Scam by NDTV
Author(s) : Madhu Purnima Kishwar



Some weeks ago, my office received a big bundle of papers along with two DVDs by courier. The name and address of the recipient was Ranthambore Rana, resident of D-55, Defence Colony, New Delhi. I do not know any such person but the bunch of papers and the two DVDs contained very disturbing information. (When a Manushi volunteer went to check at the given address, we found someone else living there.)

They provide in-depth information with detailed documentation regarding an unholy partnership between Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and directors of premier TV channel—NDTV. It took me days to go through and make sense of these papers, which I also got vetted by a senior lawyer. Even so, I was diffident in putting this information in the public domain lest I make an error of judgement. However, on 6 December 2013, former Law Minister and now MP, Shri Ram Jethmalani sent a letter to Mr Chidambaram directly accusing him of receiving a bribe of Rs. 5000 crore and then getting it laundered by NDTV and harassing Srivastava who attempted to inquire into this economic offence. (Click here to view Srivastava's account to his lawyers).
you can read at http://www.manushi.in/articles.php?articleId=1749#.UuSZPBy6a1s
rashmi
January 26, 2014
Report Abuse