Tackling scourge of terrorism in Kashmir, Congress-style
by Hari Om on 30 Mar 2013 3 Comments

The situation in parts of the Kashmir Valley is highly volatile. It’s not just Pakistan which considers Jammu & Kashmir an “unfinished agenda of partition” that has been exporting terror to Kashmir (and other parts of India) and doing all that it can to motivate and inspire its Valley-based operatives to intensify, bleed and break India. Islamabad-backed and Pakistan-occupied-Jammu & Kashmir-based terror organizations like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) are also not leaving any stone unturned to accomplish their anti-India design in Kashmir and ensure that Islamabad establishes its control over the precious Indus waters. Reports, in addition, suggest the presence of al-Qaida in certain areas of Kashmir Valley, which is the most prosperous region in the world. 

 

More disturbing is the fact that there are elements in the Jammu & Kashmir establishment who have also been extending overt and covert support to forces inimical to India. So much so, they have been using the state legislature for provoking gullible sections of Kashmiri Muslim society to rise in revolt. There is hardly any Kashmiri leader who doesn’t hate India, Indian institutions and Indian laws.

 

Four major demands of Kashmiri leaders are greater autonomy, self-rule, independence and merger with Pakistan. There is another group in Kashmir which has been advocating the need to accept and implement former Pakistan President General Pervez Musharraf’s four-point Kashmir formula as a first step towards the final destination: Separation from India. Acceptance of Musharraf’s four-point formula automatically means self-governance for Jammu & Kashmir, demilitarization, India-Pakistan joint control over the State and a porous Line of Control (LoC). In other words, it means recognition of Pakistani claim over Jammu & Kashmir, which is legitimately Indian.

 

The point is that all anti-India forces are working as per a diligently evolved strategy and in tandem, believing this is the most appropriate moment to strike. What happened on and after February 8, 2013 clearly suggests that the hostile forces in and outside Kashmir have been able to bloody the Indian political scene with utmost ease. During this short span of time, they struck at least six times. These attacks left two Lance Naiks, five CRPF personal, two police constables and one BSP personnel dead and at least an equal number of others, including some civilians, critically injured. Some are still battling for their lives.

 

A terror-related incident on March 20 left one young Kashmiri Muslim Suhail Ahmad Sofi dead. Actually, the Lashkar terrorists chased this young boy and shot him dead within the premises of a mosque in militant-infested Sopore. They pumped five bullets into his body. Their objective was to produce a moral effect so that no Kashmiri Muslim talks about and hails India. Sofi was suspected by the LeT operatives to be an informer of the security forces.

 

To say all this is not to suggest that the Indian Army and paramilitary forces have failed the nation. They have not. They have been fighting splendidly and making supreme sacrifices while combating the scourge of terrorism and the menace of separatism. They are so committed that left to themselves they would have cleansed the Valley and other militant and separatist-infested areas of the state in no time. But the Congress-controlled political establishment has not given them a free hand to deal with the situation for reasons not really difficult to understand. This is a statement of fact.

 

In would be in order here to mention two components of the policy which the NC-Congress coalition government has been pursuing in the State, at the behest of the Congress-led UPA at the centre, against terrorism. One, the establishment has directed the concerned authorities responsible for maintaining law and order and tackling militants to ensure that paramilitary forces do not carry firearms with them. “As already decided in video conference, please ensure that all police/paramilitary personnel deployed for law and order duty under your jurisdiction don’t carry any firearms/weapons with them. They should only be well-equipped in full riot gear. Proper drill should be observed in dealing with law and order situation while using gas guns, tear smoke shells. Deployment shouldn’t be made in scattered manner. Violation of these instructions will be viewed seriously. The PCR shall be kept informed with the deployment,” the March 1, 2013 order read. The order was issued by Inspector General of Police, Kashmir division. And remember, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah holds the key Home portfolio. 

 

Two, the political establishment in the State has been providing a foolproof security cover to Kashmiri separatists. On March 22, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah himself informed the Assembly that the “government has spent Rs 9.47 crores on account of providing security cover to the Hurriyat and other separatist leaders”, that “last year alone, the state government had spent Rs 85.50 lakh on account of salaries of PSOs and drivers of Hurriyat leaders” and that “about Rs 7 lakh was spent on the fuel used in their escort vehicles in 2012”.

 

This explicitly shows that the Congress which shares power with the National Conference in the State while the NC is an ally of the Congress at the Centre, has been pursuing a policy which not only protects terrorists, murderers and separatist like Syed Ali Shah Geelani and Yasin Malik, but also disarms the security forces operating in Kashmir and elsewhere in the state.

 

There was a time when the Congress would adopt a policy of catch and kill. A case in point is the manner in which Congress Chief Minister of West Bengal, Siddharth Shankar Ray, tackled the dreaded Naxals. The Congress Chief Minister of Punjab, Sardar Beant Singh, similarly decimated the dreaded Khalistanis. Both established peace in their respective States.

 

But gone are those days. Today’s Congress wants our unarmed security force personnel to handle those who carry AK-56 rifles, grenades and other sophisticated weapons. No wonder our soldiers and jawans are paying such a heavy price for the follies of the Congress party.

 

Would it be in order to ask why these unarmed security forces are not deployed for the security of the very VIPs who issue such orders when it comes to the security of ordinary citizens?

User Comments Post a Comment
"The area also looked like a war zone, with hundreds of armed security personnel, armoured vehicles, water-cannon trucks, teargas equipment and riot-control vehicles ready to thwart any attempts to enter the state. Wire fencing augmented the blockade. "...........This sentence speaks volumes about the situation,nothing more to add.
observer
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
Omar Abdullah deserves dismissal for insulting grace of Parliament. The hauling of two leaders of opposition in
Parliament and then treating them as enemy agents by detaining for five hours at the landing pavement of Jammu Airport yesterday as most outrageous act of the Government of J&K and deserves immediate and urgent attention of Prime Minister of India to bring Chief Minister of J&K to justice. Mrs. Sushma Swaraj (Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha), Mr. Arun Jaitley (Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha) and Mr. Anant Kumar (M.P. from Karnataka) were made to stand
inside the Airport while arrival doors were shut by the police depriving the opposition leaders to use toilets even for five hours. We invite the attention of the Speaker of the Lok
Sabha and Chairman of the Rajya Sabha to take cognizance of this authoritarian act of J&K Chief Minister who acted as ‘Sultan’ of Kashmir to hurt the grace of the Parliament.
Bhim Singh
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
I am completely at a loss. When Narsimha Rao was Prime Minister, if I remember correctly, Indian Parliament pased a resolution that Pakistan occupied Kashmir was an integral part of India. What has govt of India done to enforce its resolution? Was it just an exercise in futility? Forget about Muzaffarabad for a moment, even in Srinagar the mighty Indian super power -- at least dreaming to be -- cannot unfurl the symbol of India -- why is it? Is even Srinagar part of India or not/ Why is it wrong to unfurl Indian flag? If it is not part of India then why waste national resources on it? Will there be same situation if Kashmir was not a Muslim majority state? Before 1947 Punjab, Sindh, Bengal, NWF had Muslim majority areas -- parts of these are no longer not part of India. What does it tell to a person with even an iota of common sense? Can someone please explain why is it a bad idea to unfurl Indian flag in its own territory? Can someone give me at one simple sensible reason.
Vinod
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
"Can someone give me at one simple sensible reason",Vinod yes i can!Does a "DISPUTED" teritory ring any bells for you?Does those United Nation's resolution agreed upon by the democratically elected Indian goverenments has any weight on you?Does those promises/speaches made by your elected Prime Minister in Lal chowk has any meaning to you?Does those Green flags hoisted by Kashmiris tells you any thing?Does those rules (agreed upon by Hindu and Muslim leaders of the time) by which the partion was to take place means any thing to you,just to jog your memory let me repeat them again ,all the Muslim majority areas would go to Pakistan and the other to India.If still you are not clear then you could be suffering from a retrograde amnesia,with best regards.
observer
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
The facts of the resolution is as follows. It was Atal Bihari Vajpayee, then Leader of the Opposition, had introduced a resolution in the Lok Sabha reiterating that the whole of Jammu & Kashmir is part of India. Narsimha Rao suggested to Atalji that instead of the latter, the resolution should be moved by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, at the time it was Shivraj Patil. The Lok Sabha then passed the resolution unanimously. In this context, it is also necessary another resolution which Atalji
wanted to introduce. It was during the early 1960s, when Jawaharlal Nehru was the prime minister. The resolution was to delete Article 370 from the constitution. Jawaharlalji said that it was not necessary, since many aspects of the article had already been deleted, and that it will eventually disappear (the words used were 'ghiste ghiste ghis jayega). It should be remembered that the title of the article is "Temporary provisions regarding Jammu & Kashmir". Clearly the framers
of the constitution wanted the article to be eventually eliminated.
It is a tragedy of Indian politics that very little was done by the BJP since. However, what it more forcefully exposes is the hypocrisy of the class of people (both politicians and non-politicians) that go under the rubric 'secular'.
Ashok
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
Thanks for giving the details. It is better not to make a law than to make a law and not enforce it. It weakens the power of the state. By passing a resolution in parliament and then not enforcing it sends a clear message to the world that the GOI itself does not believe in what it says. It now does not even have a fig leaf to cover itself.

India's problems are its own creation -- it is naive to blame others.

What credibility does the GOI can have abroad when its government itself declines to hoist its own national flag in its own boundaries. Is the mighty GOI afraid of a few hoodlums? What right such an administration have to run a country -- whether it is BJP or Congress. It is not a question of party -- it is a matter whether J&K is part of India or not and what does the administration think of it.
Vinod
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
I think such a statement is a blanket condemnation of the people at large, and, if so, is most unfair on the population. It should be understood that the ones creating the problems are those who think that they are guiding the destiny of the nation. And, here, the major culprits are those who are supposed to occupy the intellectual space in the society, and not so much the politicians. It is these 'intellectuals' who are expected to explain the issues to the people in a dispassionate manner. But they use their position to push forward their own personal agenda, and not the truth.
Ashok
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
One is horrified to learn that J&K police entered the Durganath mandir, Chinar Mandir and Hanuman Mandir in Srinagar to look for the hidden Hindus who may hoist the flag. Some nationalists who reached the venue later with flag were badly roughed up by the secular CM's men. Shame. Would he dare to have men in uniform enter churches and mosques to look for terrorists and would the great secular media have blocked out the news? Shame
Rajan
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
I am astonished to learn that Omar Abdullah has broken the established conventiont that the National flag at Jammu (winter capital of J&K) is hoisted by the Governor of the state whereas in Srinagar it is hoisted by the Chief Minister. Today however one learns with astonishment that Omar Abdullah deputed a minister to perform this ‘ritual’ at Srinagar Bakhshi Stadium at a cosmetic ceremony attended by 40 civilians mostly Govt employees. The NC Chief Minister has given a clear message to his patrons in Delhi and elsewhere that he means business and to the separatists thatNC stands by his commitment to champion the cause of the terrorists by challenging the states integration with the Union of India and daring to stop BJP’s entry to J&K
Addy
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
Pls read foll. links:
http://satyameva-jayate.org/2011/01/25/disturb-sleep/
http://www.sandeepweb.com/2011/01/25/lal-chowk-today-lal-qila-tomorrow/
and especially
http://vinodksharma.blogspot.com/2010/09/for-today-of-few-tomorrow-of-india.html

Jai Hind!
seadog4227
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
observer seems to be suffering from some selective amnesia. With 40% of J&K being non-sunni and desperately wanting to remain in India, you have no locus standi. Do you think India will send them into the fundamentalist maw of pakistan where they will be butchered or converted like the 10% of pakistani hindus who remained after partition? Don't quote rules and agreements when civilized nations all agree that genocide is a crime against humanity. Your wretched pakistan is guilty of it both within its boundaries and within the boundaries of bangladesh where it snuffed out the lives of 3 million people. you have no moral authority and are just making a laughingstock of yourself. Ethnic kashmiri hindus, sikhs, shias, christians and buddhists all wish to remain in India and want no part of your fundamentalist vision of kashmir--remember that.
Nagabhatta I
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
BJP did a great thing by taking up the flag hoisting issue at Lal Chowk. We understand what this event conveyed. A Muslim majority area will not allow the tri colour to be unfurled. Those who understand the significance of this will get the picture clearly. Slowly but surely more and more areas in India will not see the tri colour hoisted.
Shivram
January 27, 2011
Report Abuse