Gaza Ceasefire: Palestine holds strong in the face of US-backed Israeli terror
by Richard Becker on 09 Dec 2012 1 Comment
A ceasefire agreement between the Hamas-led Palestinian government in Gaza and Israel was announced today, Nov.21, in Cairo by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohammed Kamel Amr. Clinton made an emergency trip to the Middle East with the aim of brokering a truce, a clear sign of the Obama administration’s fears that the continuation of the brutal Israeli assault on Gaza was endangering US imperialist interests in the region.

 

Since Israel’s latest intense bombing campaign began last week, Clinton, President Obama, and Republican and Democratic congressional leaders have repeatedly expressed all-out support for the Israeli side, while pointedly ignoring far higher Palestinian casualties. The House of Representatives “passed” a resolution expressing its “unwavering commitment” to Israel. House Resolution 813 was introduced at 12:04 p.m. on Nov. 16, and declared adopted at 12:05 p.m. the same day!

 

Since Nov. 14, at least 146Palestinians have been killed, more than 1,000 wounded, and much of Gaza’s infrastructure and public facilities destroyed by a coordinated air, sea and land-based bombardment. On the Israeli side, there have been five killed and more than 100 wounded.

 

To hear US officials talk, you would think it was the other way around. But despite their obscenely pro-Israel rhetoric, it was also clear that Washington was fearful that a new Israeli ground invasion of Gaza might provoke rebellions in Egypt, Jordan and other neighboring Arab countries, and possibly lead to a wider war.

 

Despite the death and destruction inflicted by Israel, and despite the fact that it has no air force, navy,armored units or anti-aircraft defenses, the Palestinian forces have not been defeated. Virtually all news reports from inside Gaza reflect a strong determination to resist among the population.

 

The terms of the temporary agreement reportedly call for a halt to the fighting, an end to Israeli targeted assassinations of Palestinian leaders, and undefined steps to lift the Israeli blockade that has inflicted massive suffering on the 1.6 million Palestinians in Gaza.

 

Lifting the blockade is a critical issue for the people of Gaza. Whether there will be any real movement toward ending the blockade remains in doubt, as does the durability of the truce as a whole.

 

Israel’s Blockade: Using food as a weapon

 

While Israel withdrew its settlers and bases from Gaza in 2005, it has kept the area surrounded and blockaded ever since. As result, half of all school children are malnourished and two-thirds of infants are anemic. Eighty percent of Gaza’s population are refugees — those driven out of other parts of Palestine by the Zionist military forces in 1948and their descendants.

After the Hamas party won the January 2006 Palestinian parliamentary election, Israel imposed a complete blockade on Gaza, with the support of the United States, European Union and the client government of Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. That the aim of the blockade was to make the people of Gaza suffer was highlighted by an article in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz the following month. It reported on a meeting of top Israeli government officials where the top adviser to then-Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Dov Weisglass, said: “It’s like an appointment with a dietician. The Palestinians will get a lot thinner but won’t die.” According to the Ha’aretz report, the assembled officials “rolled with laughter,” at Weislglass’ grotesque“joke.”

 

The Myth of Israel as victim

 

In the 1960s, the Black Panther Party had a saying about racist cops justifying their routine killing and brutalizing of Black people by “masquerading as the victim of an unprovoked attack.” It is a description that perfectly fits Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his predecessors going back to the creation of the Israeli state in 1948.

 

In the US corporate media, Israel is invariably depicted as the “victim.” Its brutal and cowardly military assaults are justified as “retaliation,” inferring that Israel’s actions are“self-defense.” Over and over, since the early 1950s, successive Israeli governments have staged provocations to prompt responses that could then be used to justify massive attacks while presenting Israel as the “victim of an unprovoked attack.” The aim has generally been to gain new territory and/or crush any state or movement perceived as a threat to Israeli military domination.

 

This familiar pattern was repeated in November 2008. The murder of five Palestinian civilians on the day after the2008 US election broke a ceasefire and set in motion a train of events that led to an all-out assault on Gaza by the Israeli military. A vast array of weaponry, including white phosphorous and depleted uranium munitions was unleashed on a trapped population. More than 1,400 Palestinians were killed,while Israeli forces had 13 killed - a ratio of more than 100 to 1.

 

This time, the fatal shooting of a mentally disabled young man on Nov. 5 and a 12-year-old boy on Nov. 9, both killed by the Israeli army inside Gaza, set off the new round of fighting.Then, on Nov. 14, Israel assassinated a top Hamas leader, Ahmed Al-Jaabari, the very same day that he had been presented with a proposal for a long-term ceasefire by a joint Israeli-Egyptian commission.

 

These provocations were no doubt approved at the highest level of the Israeli government. The extreme right-wing Netanyahu-Lieberman government desired a new conflict both to further devastate the Palestinian infrastructure in Gaza and to advance their political prospects in the January 2013 Israeli election. That hundreds of Palestinians and some Israelis as well would die in order to achieve these objectives was incidental to the Israeli leaders.

 

Whether the present ceasefire holds and for how long can’t be known at this point. The only real long-term solution to the crisis is to end colonial occupation and real self-determination for the Palestinian people, including the right to return to their homeland.

 

Copyright © 2012 Global Research; courtesy GlobalResearch.ca

http://www.globalresearch.ca/gaza-ceasefire-palestine-holds-strong-in-the-face-of-u-s-backed-israeli-terror/5312679

 

User Comments Post a Comment
"Despite the death and destruction inflicted by Israel, and despite the fact that it has no air force, navy,armored units or anti-aircraft defenses, the Palestinian forces have not been defeated. Virtually all news reports from inside Gaza reflect a strong determination to resist among the population."

"Resistance" is Palestinian code for "renewed commitment to Jewish genocide."

"The terms of the temporary agreement reportedly call for a halt to the fighting, an end to Israeli targeted assassinations of Palestinian leaders, and undefined steps to lift the Israeli blockade that has inflicted massive suffering on the 1.6 million Palestinians in Gaza."

Massive suffering indeed! Gaza is home to luxury resorts, hotels, malls, beaches, water parks, and other money spinners, all of which are stocked with thousands of pounds of Israeli goods that are delivered daily.

" As result, half of all school children are malnourished and two-thirds of infants are anemic."

Poor Gaza in fact suffers an obesity crisis!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf21QqvHauw&feature=player_embedded

"Eighty percent of Gaza’s population are refugees — those driven out of other parts of Palestine by the Zionist military forces in 1948 and their descendants."

Most people in Gaza are the *descendents* of the 1948 refugees, who were driven out during a war provoked by the Arabs in Mandatory Palestine and later the surrounding Arab states bent on Jewish genocide, and thus can hardly be considered refugees themselves.

"In the US corporate media, Israel is invariably depicted as the “victim.” Its brutal and cowardly military assaults are justified as “retaliation,” inferring that Israel’s actions are“self-defense.” Over and over, since the early 1950s, successive Israeli governments have staged provocations to prompt responses that could then be used to justify massive attacks while presenting Israel as the “victim of an unprovoked attack.” The aim has generally been to gain new territory and/or crush any state or movement perceived as a threat to Israeli military domination."

The most brutal and cowardly party in the conflict is Hamas, which uses commits double war crimes by storing and firing missiles in mosques, homes, hospitals, and other civilian areas into Israeli civilian areas, so that when Israel fires back, Palestinian civilians will die, and Hamas can drag the bodies before the international media and complain about the "brutality" of Israel. That Hamas makes children become suicide bombers shows exactly how much they care about their own people. Every Israeli war has been a response to Arab genocidal provocation, and Israel has in fact given up territory since 1967 for the sake of peace.

"This familiar pattern was repeated in November 2008. The murder of five Palestinian civilians on the day after the2008 US election broke a ceasefire and set in motion a train of events that led to an all-out assault on Gaza by the Israeli military. A vast array of weaponry, including white phosphorous and depleted uranium munitions was unleashed on a trapped population. More than 1,400 Palestinians were killed,while Israeli forces had 13 killed - a ratio of more than 100 to 1.

This time, the fatal shooting of a mentally disabled young man on Nov. 5 and a 12-year-old boy on Nov. 9, both killed by the Israeli army inside Gaza, set off the new round of fighting.Then, on Nov. 14, Israel assassinated a top Hamas leader, Ahmed Al-Jaabari, the very same day that he had been presented with a proposal for a long-term ceasefire by a joint Israeli-Egyptian commission."

The Gaza attacks were responses to thousands of Hamas rockets raining down upon Israeli civilians. The notion that Jabari was actually willing to negotiate a truce is rather unlikely given that, at the time he allegedly received it, his own party was firing missiles at the very people the author insists that they were supposedly willing to negotiate with. At any rate, a truce is just that: a temporary agreement which will allow Hamas time to gain more weapons for a stronger future assault. Israel needs peace, not delayed jihad. It is also important to add that Jabari himself was responsible for the murder of hundreds of Israelis in terrorist attacks during the Second Intifada, so it is hardly surprising that Israel would want him dead.

"Whether the present ceasefire holds and for how long can’t be known at this point. The only real long-term solution to the crisis is to end colonial occupation and real self-determination for the Palestinian people, including the right to return to their homeland."

The Palestinians already have self determination through the Hamas and Fatah governments, and it is no one's fault but theirs if they elect corrupt, despotic terrorists to lead them. A Palestinian state would not only be born in civil war between Hamas and Fatah, it would have a dead economy dependent upon international aid from UNRWA, and would be yet another iron fisted Arab dictatorship, with no individual freedom or civil rights for anyone, let along women, gays, or religious minorities. Jews, would of course, be banned entirely from this state, as Mahmoud Abbas himself as insisted upon. The Palestinian "right of return" is just as unnecessary as the right of return for any refugees in any other conflict in the 20th century, such as WWII or the Indian Partition. They have all been assimilated in other countries, and the Palestinian refugees ought to have been assimilated into Arab states, just as the Jews who were ethnically cleansed from the Arab world were assimilated into Israel around the same time. The Arab states, as well as Hamas and Fatah, keep Palestinians locked up in refugee camps generation after generation so that their numbers actually increase (rather than decreasing as refugees get resettled in other countries,) so that they can be used to eventually flood Israel with Arabs via the bogus "right of return" and end the Jewish state.
si91
December 09, 2012
Report Abuse