Negating Indian Nationalism: Congress and National Conference
by Hari Om on 26 Jan 2011 12 Comments

In one of the darkest moments in our post-1947 history, Indian nationalism was mocked and possibly even negated by the cussed intolerance of the Congress led by Italian-born Sonia Gandhi and the Islamic-separatist-centric National Conference of Chief Minister Omar Abdullah. At the time of finalizing this article, there was no guarantee that the tricolour would be unfurled from Srinagar’s historic Lal Chowk, despite heroic efforts by intrepid nationalists from across the country, led by the Bharatiya Janata Party’s youth wing.

 

In a shocking new low in public life, the Leaders of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley, along with party general secretary Ananth Kumar, were arrested for the second time on Tuesday evening by the duplicitous National Conference-Congress coalition, mentored by the Congress-led UPA at the Centre.

 

Previously, on Monday, the state government had unleashed a brazen reign of terror against all nationalists entering the state and had arrested (they said detained) Sushma Swaraj, Arun Jaitley and Ananth Kumar at Jammu airport. When the trio refused to return to Delhi, they were declared to be under arrest, packed in separate cars and crudely deported to the Punjab border at Madhopur. Though taken aback by this brazen and graceless muscle power, the BJP quickly rallied and called for a Jammu bandh on Tuesday to protest the detention and arrest of leaders and activists en route to Lal Chowk. The bandh was a complete success.

 

Yesterday, 25 Jan., party leaders and cadres and flag-bearing supporters tried to re-enter the state to take the Ekta Yatra launched by Yuwa Morcha president Anurag Thakur to its final destination, but were arrested for violating Section 144, which prohibits the assembly for more than four persons at any place.

 

All this is qualitatively different from the midnight arrests of Jaya Prakash Narayan and opposition leaders during the Emergency, and there is no way a state government could have dared arrest the Leaders of Opposition of both Houses of Parliament without fulsome backing of the Centre. It is a gross breach of privilege of Parliament, done without giving reason and taking consent of the Speaker and Vice Chairman of the respective Houses, and will doubtless reverberate in Parliament in the coming budget session.

 

Should the Tiranga be successfully unfurled tomorrow, Republic Day, BJP may forgive and move on, but regardless of how the day passes it is within its rights to demand the sacking of the Omar Abdullah Government, withdrawal of State Governor N.N. Vohra who remained mute throughout the crisis, and Home Minister P. Chidambaram for instigating the reckless Abdullah to challenge Indian nationalism head-on.

 

As is now typical in such situations, UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi and wanna-be PM Rahul Gandhi are conspicuous by their silence, and personally invisible. The nation never knows what they think in any and every crisis, what role they play in aggravating every situation. Even Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, having made the desired noises against the Tiranga Yatra, has followed the Gandhis into their favourite burrow and pulled it in after him, leaving the bombastic Home Minister to face the public, holding his foot in his mouth! Chidambaram inanely repeats that Kashmir has a unique history and unique geography and needs a unique solution – whatever that means – but is unable to explain why the flag cannot be unfurled there. Most of the union cabinet has taken refuge in silence; UPA allies believe discretion is the better part of valour; but the ingrate allies of the NDA – most notably Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and his cohort Sharad Yadav – have distinguished themselves with knavery and skullduggery.

 

As for the Indian electronic media, it surpassed itself in crawling before the wishes of the Italian-born Roman Catholic soon-to-be ex-empress of India. Initially some channels did show the mammoth crowds of nationalists on the Ravi bridge, trying to enter Jammu. But as reports of a surge in nationalism poured in from across the country, frowns went out, and the channels duly blacked out the crowds and the flag. One intrepid journalist gave a gush-gush ‘exclusive’ interview with Omar Abdullah (more likely a command performance), and we were told that he was a good man doing his constitutional duty by keeping nationalist riff-raff out of the state!

 

The Day of the Republic, the day we gave ourselves the Constitution and salute the Tiranga as symbol of the Republic, is thus shrouded in uncertainty and sadness. Omar Abdullah says that entering the state with the national flag will provoke the Kashmir separatists. His government did nothing last year when they burnt the tricolour at Lal Chowk and unfurled the flag of Pakistan! To this day, not a single person has been arrested. Nor has Yasin Malik been arrested for threatening to unfurl the Islamic flag or Pakistani flag; he was allowed to move freely with supporters in Lal Chowk for three days, and went conveniently missing when police allegedly moved to arrest him.

 

Neither the NC-Congress nor their subservient media, nor the pugnacious over-ambitious wanna-be NDA PM-in-waiting Nitish Kumar, is able to realise that the Tiranga Yatra is a courageous response by youth to that chilling insult to the nation. It is only fitting that the response has come from followers of Syama Prasad Mookerji who gave his life to compel the then powers-that-be to end the hated permit system for entry into the state. That supreme sacrifice won the people of the state the benefit of the Election Commission and the Supreme Court of India; it ended the pernicious custom of calling the chief minister the ‘prime minister’ of the state.

 

Through all the repression however, India’s bush telegraph worked like a charm and huge crowds gathered at Madhopur bridge separating Punjab and Kashmir, where the opposition leaders reiterated their determination to go ahead with the yatra and unfurl the flag at Lal Chowk. The area also looked like a war zone, with hundreds of armed security personnel, armoured vehicles, water-cannon trucks, teargas equipment and riot-control vehicles ready to thwart any attempts to enter the state. Wire fencing augmented the blockade.

 

Fasting at Rajghat in Delhi, former BJP president Rajnath Singh condemned the regime’s actions and said it was the fundamental right of the party's youth wing to hoist the national flag in Srinagar on Republic Day.

 

Tensions have run high in the past 48 hours as thousands of BJP activists have been arrested, and Jammu-bound trains ferrying activists cancelled or diverted, and the borders sealed. Lakhanpur, gateway to the state, has been sealed and even ordinary tourists are being rounded up on suspicion of being BJP activists; the few ingenious warriors who managed to slip into Jammu and Srinagar cities are being roughed up and hauled away. Their fate will be known only later. It may be recalled that on Sunday, a trainload of BJP youth travelling to Lal Chowk from Bangalore, was illegally diverted back to Bangalore in the dead of night while the passengers were sleeping. This was obviously at the behest of the Central Government whose complicity in all that is going wrong in the nation can hardly be over-emphasised.

 

The whole state has been turned into a fortress under Section 144. All educational institutions have been shut, and BJP was not allowed to hold a rally even in Jammu. The Banihal tunnel is closed. Common people have been prevented from venturing out of their homes. All inter-district highways, namely, Jammu-Rajouri, Rajouri-Poonch, Jammu-Doda, Doda-Kishtwar have also been shut for two days to paralyze movement of sympathizers to Srinagar and Lal Chowk! It is a virtual Emergency – nay, even martial law rule – and reminds one of wartime restrictions on civil liberties.

 

Here in Kashmir, all Kashmiri leaders without exception are up in arms against the BJP. Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, PDP president Mehbooba Mufti, JKPCC chief Saif-ud-din Soz, CPI-M leader Mohammad Yousuf Tarigami, JKLF leader and murderer Yasin Malik, merchant of death and Pakistani agent Syed Ali Shah Geelani, protagonist of right to self-determination Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, to name only a few, are singing the same song: BJP is a communal outfit; BJP is anti-national; BJP is divisive; BJP is disturber of peace…

 

But why didn’t the Union Government and Government of Jammu & Kashmir act when the separatists, particularly Syed Ali Shah Geelani, in October 2010 challenged the very institution of the Indian State and declared Jammu & Kashmir was not part of India? He and Maoist sympathizers like Arundhati Roy and Varvara Rao maligned India and demanded independence for Kashmir under the noses of authorities in New Delhi; he was opposed only by a handful of intrepid nationalists.

 

Doesn’t Omar Abdullah realise that saying the hoisting of the flag at Lal Chowk will inflict more wounds on the Kashmiri people (read Muslims) is tantamount to saying that the only nationalists in India are Hindus. Has it really come to this?

 

Mr Chidambaram cuts a sorry figure when he asks Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj to give up confrontation and not push a ‘political agenda’. Doesn’t he know that saluting the flag, symbol of the Republic, is a political act of affirmation in the sovereignty of the nation? Surely he understands that abandoning the yatra would hand over a massive political and moral victory to the secessionists, stone-pelters, and their foreign masters, who still dream of cutting Kashmir off from India.

 

The nation must rise as one and bring down political leaders who have made a mockery of the nation; tempting the international community to mock at us and look at us with contempt. It was not to see this day that thousands of Indians sacrificed their lives during the freedom struggle, which began when the first inimical forces invaded the sacred territory of Bharat and confronted its civilisation centuries ago. Uncounted millions of intrepid sons and daughters have sacrificed precious lives in the fight for our civilisational values and freedoms, our place of honour in the comity of nations. To mark time would be to negate the supreme sacrifices our ancestors made for Mother India and empower anti-India forces to dismember the nation.

 

The author is former Chair Professor, Maharaja Gulab Singh Chair, University of Jammu, Jammu, & former member Indian Council of Historical Research 

User Comments Post a Comment
"The area also looked like a war zone, with hundreds of armed security personnel, armoured vehicles, water-cannon trucks, teargas equipment and riot-control vehicles ready to thwart any attempts to enter the state. Wire fencing augmented the blockade. "...........This sentence speaks volumes about the situation,nothing more to add.
observer
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
Omar Abdullah deserves dismissal for insulting grace of Parliament. The hauling of two leaders of opposition in
Parliament and then treating them as enemy agents by detaining for five hours at the landing pavement of Jammu Airport yesterday as most outrageous act of the Government of J&K and deserves immediate and urgent attention of Prime Minister of India to bring Chief Minister of J&K to justice. Mrs. Sushma Swaraj (Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha), Mr. Arun Jaitley (Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha) and Mr. Anant Kumar (M.P. from Karnataka) were made to stand
inside the Airport while arrival doors were shut by the police depriving the opposition leaders to use toilets even for five hours. We invite the attention of the Speaker of the Lok
Sabha and Chairman of the Rajya Sabha to take cognizance of this authoritarian act of J&K Chief Minister who acted as ‘Sultan’ of Kashmir to hurt the grace of the Parliament.
Bhim Singh
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
I am completely at a loss. When Narsimha Rao was Prime Minister, if I remember correctly, Indian Parliament pased a resolution that Pakistan occupied Kashmir was an integral part of India. What has govt of India done to enforce its resolution? Was it just an exercise in futility? Forget about Muzaffarabad for a moment, even in Srinagar the mighty Indian super power -- at least dreaming to be -- cannot unfurl the symbol of India -- why is it? Is even Srinagar part of India or not/ Why is it wrong to unfurl Indian flag? If it is not part of India then why waste national resources on it? Will there be same situation if Kashmir was not a Muslim majority state? Before 1947 Punjab, Sindh, Bengal, NWF had Muslim majority areas -- parts of these are no longer not part of India. What does it tell to a person with even an iota of common sense? Can someone please explain why is it a bad idea to unfurl Indian flag in its own territory? Can someone give me at one simple sensible reason.
Vinod
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
"Can someone give me at one simple sensible reason",Vinod yes i can!Does a "DISPUTED" teritory ring any bells for you?Does those United Nation's resolution agreed upon by the democratically elected Indian goverenments has any weight on you?Does those promises/speaches made by your elected Prime Minister in Lal chowk has any meaning to you?Does those Green flags hoisted by Kashmiris tells you any thing?Does those rules (agreed upon by Hindu and Muslim leaders of the time) by which the partion was to take place means any thing to you,just to jog your memory let me repeat them again ,all the Muslim majority areas would go to Pakistan and the other to India.If still you are not clear then you could be suffering from a retrograde amnesia,with best regards.
observer
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
The facts of the resolution is as follows. It was Atal Bihari Vajpayee, then Leader of the Opposition, had introduced a resolution in the Lok Sabha reiterating that the whole of Jammu & Kashmir is part of India. Narsimha Rao suggested to Atalji that instead of the latter, the resolution should be moved by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, at the time it was Shivraj Patil. The Lok Sabha then passed the resolution unanimously. In this context, it is also necessary another resolution which Atalji
wanted to introduce. It was during the early 1960s, when Jawaharlal Nehru was the prime minister. The resolution was to delete Article 370 from the constitution. Jawaharlalji said that it was not necessary, since many aspects of the article had already been deleted, and that it will eventually disappear (the words used were 'ghiste ghiste ghis jayega). It should be remembered that the title of the article is "Temporary provisions regarding Jammu & Kashmir". Clearly the framers
of the constitution wanted the article to be eventually eliminated.
It is a tragedy of Indian politics that very little was done by the BJP since. However, what it more forcefully exposes is the hypocrisy of the class of people (both politicians and non-politicians) that go under the rubric 'secular'.
Ashok
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
Thanks for giving the details. It is better not to make a law than to make a law and not enforce it. It weakens the power of the state. By passing a resolution in parliament and then not enforcing it sends a clear message to the world that the GOI itself does not believe in what it says. It now does not even have a fig leaf to cover itself.

India's problems are its own creation -- it is naive to blame others.

What credibility does the GOI can have abroad when its government itself declines to hoist its own national flag in its own boundaries. Is the mighty GOI afraid of a few hoodlums? What right such an administration have to run a country -- whether it is BJP or Congress. It is not a question of party -- it is a matter whether J&K is part of India or not and what does the administration think of it.
Vinod
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
I think such a statement is a blanket condemnation of the people at large, and, if so, is most unfair on the population. It should be understood that the ones creating the problems are those who think that they are guiding the destiny of the nation. And, here, the major culprits are those who are supposed to occupy the intellectual space in the society, and not so much the politicians. It is these 'intellectuals' who are expected to explain the issues to the people in a dispassionate manner. But they use their position to push forward their own personal agenda, and not the truth.
Ashok
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
One is horrified to learn that J&K police entered the Durganath mandir, Chinar Mandir and Hanuman Mandir in Srinagar to look for the hidden Hindus who may hoist the flag. Some nationalists who reached the venue later with flag were badly roughed up by the secular CM's men. Shame. Would he dare to have men in uniform enter churches and mosques to look for terrorists and would the great secular media have blocked out the news? Shame
Rajan
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
I am astonished to learn that Omar Abdullah has broken the established conventiont that the National flag at Jammu (winter capital of J&K) is hoisted by the Governor of the state whereas in Srinagar it is hoisted by the Chief Minister. Today however one learns with astonishment that Omar Abdullah deputed a minister to perform this ‘ritual’ at Srinagar Bakhshi Stadium at a cosmetic ceremony attended by 40 civilians mostly Govt employees. The NC Chief Minister has given a clear message to his patrons in Delhi and elsewhere that he means business and to the separatists thatNC stands by his commitment to champion the cause of the terrorists by challenging the states integration with the Union of India and daring to stop BJP’s entry to J&K
Addy
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
Pls read foll. links:
http://satyameva-jayate.org/2011/01/25/disturb-sleep/
http://www.sandeepweb.com/2011/01/25/lal-chowk-today-lal-qila-tomorrow/
and especially
http://vinodksharma.blogspot.com/2010/09/for-today-of-few-tomorrow-of-india.html

Jai Hind!
seadog4227
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
observer seems to be suffering from some selective amnesia. With 40% of J&K being non-sunni and desperately wanting to remain in India, you have no locus standi. Do you think India will send them into the fundamentalist maw of pakistan where they will be butchered or converted like the 10% of pakistani hindus who remained after partition? Don't quote rules and agreements when civilized nations all agree that genocide is a crime against humanity. Your wretched pakistan is guilty of it both within its boundaries and within the boundaries of bangladesh where it snuffed out the lives of 3 million people. you have no moral authority and are just making a laughingstock of yourself. Ethnic kashmiri hindus, sikhs, shias, christians and buddhists all wish to remain in India and want no part of your fundamentalist vision of kashmir--remember that.
Nagabhatta I
January 26, 2011
Report Abuse
BJP did a great thing by taking up the flag hoisting issue at Lal Chowk. We understand what this event conveyed. A Muslim majority area will not allow the tri colour to be unfurled. Those who understand the significance of this will get the picture clearly. Slowly but surely more and more areas in India will not see the tri colour hoisted.
Shivram
January 27, 2011
Report Abuse
Comments are free. However, comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. Readers may report abuse at  editorvijayvaani@gmail.com
Post a Comment
Name
E-Mail
Comments